Talk:Ipyet/2011/Schedule/online/mid-term evaluation

Mid-Term Feedback Discussions

Tip: Kindly reply to each discussion and post your comment to the questions. One post per participant. Feel free and kindly be as honest as possible.

Cheers!!
--Victor P. K. Mensah 14:53, 10 March 2011 (UTC)

[View source↑]
[History↑]

Thread title	Replies	Last modified
2. How well were you oriented/trainied to use the wiki platform?	10	00:47, 24 March 2011
1. How easy is the Wiki Platform to use?	10	00:46, 24 March 2011
3. How will you rate the CONTENT of the modules so far?	10	00:45, 24 March 2011
6. Any other comments?	10	00:42, 24 March 2011
4. How will you rate participants DISCUSSIONS so far?	10	00:39, 24 March 2011
5. How will you rate the moderation/facilitation so far?	10	00:38, 24 March 2011
«no subject»	0	04:52, 14 March 2011
Deleted discussion, DONT REPLY HERE	0	04:50, 14 March 2011

2. How well were you oriented/trainied to use the wiki platform?

Kindly state a rate between 1 - 10 with 1 being the the lowest level of orientation and 10 being well trained. After that, give your brief comments.

Victor.mensah (talk)‎

Orientation was very well done. Except some of us we missed out as we could not be there at a time the orientation was in progress. I will give 7

Isaac.fwemba (talk)‎

The orientation programme was not easy, it was hard for some of us. 6 points

Ubandoma (talk)‎

The orientation was well,it was also hard cos i kept on asking questions. 8.7

Chichi (talk)‎

5. Personnally I struggled but am now able to contribute using the wiki platform

Mulakom (talk)‎

9- I think I was guided when I had challenges. nine points is that each time a discussion is introduced we have to move to a new page and somtime we loose the discussion.

RABROD (talk)‎

9 –there was sufficient orientation process. Only we had a problem of individual time management

Ekanath (talk)‎

Oops, commented on the orientation period already. Well for orientation i rate 7.Facilitators did very well and committed their time, but i think it was taken for granted that everybody will follow through within the the required time( 15-20mins a day). At times, demands of work and other distractions prevented partcipants from finishing the daily assignements, so before you get to master a daily assignment, a new addition is given the next day, this affected the level of understanding on how to use the wikiplatform.

Shining Star (talk)‎

3points : the time was too short and we were being rushed

Luckyluka (talk)‎

The orientation was fine. Just that some tasks like adding images needed more time.

Rating: 7

GabKon (talk)‎

Rating 8.

I guess I still don't understand somethings with it.

Koziba (talk)‎

1. How easy is the Wiki Platform to use?

Kindly state a rate between 1 - 10 with 1 being the lowest level of ease and 10 being extremely easy. After that, give your brief comments.

Victor.mensah (talk)‎

It is very easy. In that one is able to use even without much struggle. It is closer to the task bar found in words and other applications. thus very flexible. I will give it 7.8

Isaac.fwemba (talk)‎

Hi,

Good question for evaluation. Wikieducator is interesting. At first, it was not difficult and not interesting, but now is ok. 8points for wikieducator

Ubandoma (talk)‎

At first it was very difficult but interesting and fun. 9, because it was not easy.

Chichi (talk)‎

8...though I struggled with the orientaion, I now find it easy

Mulakom (talk)‎

9 - I am confortable--RABROD 09:58, 12 March 2011 (UTC)

RABROD (talk)‎

I rate 8. Initial it was bit tricky. After receiving guidance from the members now it is more convenient

Ekanath (talk)‎

I rate 8points. Well the platform is easy to use,once you have learnt how to use it, but i think the orientation course (i.e the period of learning how to use the platform)was a bit too long and time consuming too.It wasnt 15-20mins a day as we were told it will be.

Shining Star (talk)‎

4points: It wasnt easy for me

Luckyluka (talk)‎

It was fairly easy. I rate it 9!

GabKon (talk)‎

At first it was difficult but later managed to play around with it .

I will give it 8

Koziba (talk)‎

3. How will you rate the CONTENT of the modules so far?

Kindly state a rate between 1 - 10 with 1 being the good and 10 being excellent. After that, give your brief comments.

Victor.mensah (talk)‎

The content of the training was good. I will give 8.5. Though we needed more than just fundamentals principlses

Isaac.fwemba (talk)‎

The content is ok. 8 points

Ubandoma (talk)‎

10, because this is my first time on such programme.

Chichi (talk)‎

7.5...Content in line with course title

Mulakom (talk)‎

10 - I think I learned alot new things.

RABROD (talk)‎

10- very relevant content

Ekanath (talk)‎

I will rate 9- Content is good ,and facilitators are doing excellently well. i would have rated excellent, but sometimes i struggle with understanding the relevance of some parts of the modules.

Shining Star (talk)‎

6points : The modules were adequately prepared

Luckyluka (talk)‎

Rating 9: The modules were well prepared!

GabKon (talk)‎

Hi! I think some of the modules were very brief , example the Booking one , I know nothing about booking and I had thought I will learn a lot from the discussion and get to be able to train on bookkeeping , but the content was too brief , I wish we can do more of that .

Cheer....

Koziba (talk)‎

6. Any other comments?

Thank you for you participation in the short open survey. Kindly provide any other comments you may have by reply to this post.

Victor.mensah (talk)‎

Iam content thanks

I enjoyed this workshop and it was very enriching thanks guys well done

Isaac.fwemba (talk)‎

Hi Victor,

The training programme is interesting. Indeed, it is a capacity building training programme for people working with youth

Ubandoma (talk)‎

The programme has helped me alot as a youth officer.

Chichi (talk)‎

The international perspectives are very enriching

Mulakom (talk)‎

While I have benefited alot i all subjects I look forward to have placticals especially in the bookkepping as this one will help us to practically Instruct young poeple who aspire to be businessmen and women. also these other aspects such as child labour, gender , etc. if included in our trainings would highlight alot of issues that need to be put into considerations by the trainners as well as the trainees. I was very happy for this kind of mixture of topics. its an eye opener. Thanks to the organisers.

RABROD (talk)‎

Victor, the discussion were so diverse and bought many international perspectives on child labour , gender and inclusion issues in relation to the youth entrepreneurship

Ekanath (talk)‎

Introduction to wikieducator and other wiki platforms is an added benefit which i appreciate and the course content has deepened and expanded my knowledge. Lessons learnt will certainly be useful in my work and personal life.

Shining Star (talk)‎

In future, enough time should be allocated to the pre-traning orientation in order to build confidence of partcipants.

Luckyluka (talk)‎

The topics were well chosen and very engaging. In future I think there should be a way of seeing the photos of everyone discussing just to make it a bit more real.

GabKon (talk)‎

Hi! There

In future, enough time should be allocated to the pre-traning orientation in order to build confidence of partcipants.

Hey some of us had difficulties in using the discussion forum .

But otherwise atleast I have learnt something new.

Cheers.

Koziba (talk)‎

4. How will you rate participants DISCUSSIONS so far?

Kindly state a rate between 1 - 10 with 1 being the good and 10 being excellent. After that, give your brief comments.

Victor.mensah (talk)‎

The participants involvement in the discussion , was somewhat encouraging. The only problem is that i can not provide a very objective position back by statistics. Because i do not know the working value. I can how ever provide a suggestive figure of 9.9

Isaac.fwemba (talk)‎

Victor,

Participants are enthusiastic (zealous)about the programme and that is encouraging. 8 points

Ubandoma (talk)‎

Very encouraging. The gender discussion make's the class very interesting. 8 point

Chichi (talk)‎

8 Participants have shared intersting perspectives on the modules

Mulakom (talk)‎

10 - most of the participants who contributed were pointing to the topic and then also liked what was discused.

RABROD (talk)‎

8-Very encouraging and high standard professional inputs on the context

Ekanath (talk)‎

I will rate 9: Partcipants are frank and enthusiastic in their discussions.

Shining Star (talk)‎

8points: Very Robust

Luckyluka (talk)‎

Rating: 9

Participants were vibrant and practical in the discussions. I love the way one can learn from different nations and cultures.

GabKon (talk)‎

10 : Excellent

Koziba (talk)‎

5. How will you rate the moderation/facilitation so far?

Kindly state a rate between 1 - 10 with 1 being the good and 10 being excellent. After that, give your brief comments.

Victor.mensah (talk)‎

I moderation has been excellent. For me this is excellent. I would give it 9. I enjoyed were the moderator would acknowledge and respect my views even if it is not worth salt