eduMOOC OERu Planning Group
OER university | |
---|---|
Project navigation | Home page | Members | Getting started | Group activities | Webliography | Aha! discoveries |
Quicklinks | Study group objectives | MOOC case studies | Draft survey | Draft Lurker survey |
Contents
Defining a MOOC
An online phenomenon gathering momentum over the past two years or so, a MOOC integrates the connectivity of social networking, the facilitation of an acknowledged expert in a field of study, and a collection of freely accessible online resources.
Perhaps most importantly, however, a MOOC builds on the active engagement of several hundred to several thousand “students” who self-organize their participation according to learning goals, prior knowledge and skills, and common interests. Although it may share in some of the conventions of an ordinary course, such as a predefined timeline and weekly topics for consideration, a MOOC generally carries no fees, no prerequisites other than Internet access and interest, no predefined expectations for participation, and no formal accreditation. |
Characteristics of a MOOC:
- Course
- Based on OER
- Connectivity of social networking
- Facilitated
- Large numbers of learners
- Self organisation
- No fees
- No prerequisites
- Usually no formal accreditation
Course examples
Examples of courses representing the MOOC approach are listed below for comparison and further analysis.
Code |
Date |
Course |
Institution |
Facilitators |
For credit option | Estimated No. of Participants |
Case study link |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
eL4C | Feb 2007 | Learning4Content pilot workshop | Commonwealth of Learning | Mackintosh |
No |
148 (check) | Case study eL4C |
INST 7150 |
Fall 2007 |
Introduction to Open Education |
State Univeristy of Utah, USA |
Wiley |
Yes | 55 (? for credit) |
Case study INST 7150 |
EC&I 831 | Fall 2007 | Social Media and Open Education | University of Regina, Canada | |
Yes | 363 (16 for credit) |
EC&I 831 |
|
Mar 2008 | Composing free and open online education resources | University of Art and Design Helsinki | Leinonen, Poldoja | No | 35 | |
|
2008 | Facilitating online | Otago Polytechnic | Blackall, Hegarty | Yes | 89 (9 for credit) | Case Study OPFO |
CCKO8 |
Fall 2008 |
Connectivism and Connective Knowledge Online Course |
Extended Education and Learning Technologies Centre, University of Manitoba |
Siemens, Downes |
Yes |
+ 2300 (25 for credit - capped)[1] Moodle: 178 |
Case study CCK |
EC&I 831 | Winter 2008 | Social Media and Open Education | University of Regina, Canada | |
Yes | ? (21 for credit) |
EC&I 831 |
CCK09 |
Fall 2009 |
Connectivism and Connective Knowledge Online Course |
Extended Education and Learning Technologies Centre, University of Manitoba |
Siemens, Downes |
Yes |
? Moodle: 122 |
Case study CCK |
EC&I 831 | Winter 2009 | Social Media and Open Education | University of Regina, Canada | |
Yes | |
EC&I 831 |
EC&I 831 | Fall 2009 | Social Media and Open Education | University of Regina, Canada | |
Yes | 347 (16 for credit) |
EC&I 831 |
CritLit |
June 2010 |
Critical Literacies |
National Research Council of Canada’s Institute for Information Technology (Learning and Collaborative Group) |
Kop |
No |
377 |
|
eL4C41 | Jul 2010 | Learning4Content (Wikieducator gives back). | OER Foundation | Mackintosh, Schlicht, Mathur, Sharma, Parker, Radney, Jones, Snieckus, Stewart | No |
421 |
Case study eL4C |
PLENK2010 |
Fall 2010 |
Personal Learning Environments Networks and Knowledge |
National Research Council of Canada and TEKRI, Athabasca University |
Siemens, Downes, Cormier |
No |
1610 Moodle: 206 |
Case study PLENK |
OCL4ED | Mar 2011 | Open Content Licensing for Educators | OER Foundation | Mackintosh, Hornibrook | No | 334 | Case study OCL4ED |
CCK11 |
Spring 2011 |
Connectivism and Connective Knowledge Online Course |
Extended Education and Learning Technologies Centre, University of Manitoba |
Siemens, Downes |
No |
|
Case study CCK |
LAK11 |
Spring 2011 |
Introduction to Learning and Knowledge Analytics |
TEKRI, Athabasca University |
Siemens, Dron, Cormier, Currie, Elias |
No |
|
LAK11 |
MobiMOOC |
Spring 2011 |
Mobile learning |
|
Traxler, de Waard, Metcalf, Black, Sanford, Duncan, Winters and Brown |
No |
553 (Google group) |
Case study MobiMOOC |
DS106 | Summer 2011 | Digital storytelling | University of Mary Washington | Groom | Yes | ? | Case study DS106 |
eduMOOC |
Summer 2011 |
Online learning today .. and tomorrow |
University of of Illinois Springfield |
Schroeder |
No |
+2500 |
Case study EduMOOC |
Critical reflections
- How about adding a course to the table above that represents an actual discipline area from the science, mathematics, business or health domains? Everything listed above amounts to a professional practice meta-course. Making the assumption that MOOCs work beyond professional practice courses for educators would seem to be a basic need for any OERu application of MOOcs. David Porter
- David, that's a valid point and raises the question of the suitability of the MOOC pedagogy for "disciplines" of study outside of the domain of educational practice. I'm not aware of any large open courses in the sciences or business so we need to remember this shortcoming in our study and analysis. Within the list of case studies we have examples of technical skills development, important for vocational education - but the pedagogy is distinctively different from the "Connectivism" hybrid of MOOC. Related to this question is the nature and level of the credential of the for-credit options running in parallel with the free course (which I have listed as a separate bullet below) --Wayne Mackintosh 23:36, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
- For the purposes of analysing the implementation potential of MOOC's for the OERu we must consider the nature and level of the credential. Of the courses listed above there are two post-graduate examples: INST 7150 offered by Utah State Univerisity (3 credit graduate course) and EC&I 831 at the University of Regina (which appears to be a 3 credit graduate course). To the best of my knowledge -- INST7150 was not offered in the open format in subsequent years -- so we need to establish why. However, the EC&I 831 courses have been offered in both formats in subsequent years. The CCK course was a required course (36.5 hours out of 216 hours) in the Certificate in Emerging Technologies for Learning which was offered by the Learning Technologies Centre at the University of Manitoba. Subsequently the Center was closed occasioned by the retirement of Peter Tittenberger and resignation of George Siemens at the Centre. The website for CCK11 does not reference a for-credit option. The courses offered by Otago Polytechic under the Graduate Certificate for Tertiary Teaching which carried a for-credit option are Level 7 (third year bachelor degree level) on the New Zealand Qualifications Framework. --Wayne Mackintosh 23:56, 6 July 2011 (UTC) .
Just as a note, CCK11 was offered as a for credit option, see the about page on the CCK11 website --Steph 19:47, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
Critical review case study teams
Please volunteer to assist with authoring a critical case study review by adding your name to the teams below. Teams of two or three people per case study would be ideal.
MOOC Case Study | Team |
---|---|
eL4C | Wayne Mackintosh 05:27, 2 July 2011 (UTC) (Convener);Jyoti Bawane (interested) |
INST 7150: | |
EC&I 831 | |
CCK courses | Joyce McKnight (Convener) | Steph | Apostolos K. (interested)| Osvaldo Rodriguez |
PLENK | |
OCL4ED | Wayne Mackintosh 05:27, 2 July 2011 (UTC) (Convener) |
LAK11 | |
MobiMOOC |
Ignatia / Inge de Waard 11:46, 6 July 2011 (UTC) (convener) | Apostolos K.| Osvaldo Rodriguez |
DS106 | |
EduMOOC |
Ray Schroeder (Convener) Maria Droujkova will help | Apostolos K. (interested) |Osvaldo Rodriguez |