Thinking about Lecture-based -- versus student-based

Jump to: navigation, search

Now is later ... boldly editing to capture the distinction (as I see it) ... though I am still unsure of the value of this distinction - there is so much overlap. If this is to stay in the methodology section, could it become:

  • Educators collaborating to develop OER
    • for educators
    • for learners
  • Learners collaborating to
    • learn
    • develop their own learning resources (and share them)
  • Learners and educators collaborating to
    • learn
    • and in the process produce OER
      • for educators and
      • for learners.

Again this suggests learning design ... and, given that we have no chapter on learning design as it is too broad, this would probably go under "Compose".

Anyway, I have left it here for now (as it is ok here :-).

Ktucker (talk)04:47, 23 June 2008

To Do: Check continuity as the last part of this page has changed considerably. (Look for "Lecturer-based" and "Student-based")

Ktucker (talk)05:19, 23 June 2008
Edited by another user.
Last edit: 17:05, 1 July 2008

I've changed Learner/Lecturer perspective sections in "Use" chapter to "Educator perspective" and "Learner perspective." The current version is a little hard to follow as a whole (I think that's because you see as being more logical elsewhere). One thought is to discard the section entirely, but keep the "Educator perspective" and "Learner perspective." The rest of the page would stand as-is.

Wording does look a bit awkward now and the point is lost - something like:
... the distinction between educators and learners (consumers and producers) is potentially blurry - and roles reverse - the degree of control will vary according to the nature of the OER, the relationships and activities; choose or design a methodology that works for the situation.
The point is sort of made at the end of the previous section. Ktucker 04:05, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
Sgurell (talk)10:13, 24 June 2008