Suggestion for refining the inventory of OERs

Fragment of a discussion from Talk:MUN/ReviewOERs
Jump to: navigation, search

Thanks Wayne. I think a licence column would be an easy fix - good idea.

In terms of when you do the OER audit, we needed to do it early to get a sense of what might be around and to see if there was a text book or good set of open journal articles for example. But at that time although we were clear about some of the key topics, we didn't have the order of learning ie learning pathways sorted. Actually we're still refining the module structure and order. At this point I agree, we need to have a look at the OERs again, and in some ways just putting out a call and getting feedback will be a good time to look at the collection again - particularly if anybody has anything new to add. But I'd call that part of the iterative design process, and it doesn't bother me if we have another go at it.

Slambert (talk)13:44, 18 November 2014