Should we include citations?

Fragment of a discussion from Talk:MathGloss
Jump to: navigation, search

Oh, and...

One question. I originally used a third level header for the "Notes" section. I'm wondering if a second level header would be better (second seems to be more the standard in Wikipedia).


ASnieckus (talk)08:12, 18 February 2009

This is a two-way street. <--- new for me. Thanks :)

Yep, you're right. Looks better "Notes" will become an eventually 4th. field.

I loved your books... on example MathGloss/P/Pictograph. BTW, I have a nice collection of icons. I'll upload then ASAP, and categorize them...mmmhh .... "exicons"? --chela5808 21:34, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

Chela5808 (talk)09:34, 19 February 2009

I noticed the names of your icons frequently started with K. I figured you had a collection of them. I'm looking forward to the array of choices! Alison

ASnieckus (talk)15:29, 20 February 2009

Yes, this icons correspond to Nuvola Collection You can download them from site.


I've already found in WE some of these icons having different names. I kept names intact, except for some derivative works I created from them.

Have a nice day. --chela5808 13:18, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

Chela5808 (talk)01:09, 21 February 2009