Required updates

Reword relevant sections to include and take account of
- CC0 1.0 Universal
  - Say Libre#Creative Commons and Freedom
- WMF projects are now using CC-BY-SA and CC-BY (Wikinews)
- Libre Puro draft license will become an emblem like the Libre emblem ... or just launch the licence and start using it ??
- Consider including the term "shareable"
- Mention the technical difficulties associated with NC (from David Wiley) (where is it? -original pre-WSIS debate)?
  - and also see The Case for Free Use: Reasons Not to Use a Creative Commons -NC License
- "These are extreme examples. But where does one draw the line? (We don't)." - clarify - especially wrt NC.
The amount of software which is "open source" but non-libre is significant.
Refer to Peter Suber's mis-use of "libre" in the Open Access community. See Gratis and libre open access and wikipedia page on Libre currently (2012-05-25) being drafted by Chris Sakkas.
Consider using "libre software" throughout - more consistent (and "libre software" is accepted by the FSF).
Broken links - most notably to libre.org - fix and use archive.org where appropriate.
Article expanding on issues faced by libre software: A Free Digital Society - What Makes Digital Inclusion Good or Bad?
More on privacy and surveillance, net neutrality, SaaSS.
Philosophy of the GNU Project — Latest Articles (update)
please add ...

Navigation menu