Talk:Libre emblem

• [View source↑]
• [History↑]

Sorting order: last modified first newest threads first oldest threads first

Contents

Thread title	Replies	Last modified
Rather associate "libre" with libre resources not requiring attribution?	0	12:37, 9 August 2013
Would it make sense to have a "Libre" label/emblem on physical devices?	0	12:22, 20 April 2009

Rather associate "libre" with libre resources not requiring attribution?

• History
• Summarize

e.g. ShareAlike 1.0 and a proposed update, CC0, PD, ....

Seeing the libre emblem means: when appropriate I must attribute, etc. - otherwise this resource is free to adapt, mix, ... (but do check if I need to preserve freedoms in my derived work - e.g. ShareAlike as above).

Thoughts anyone?

• How strong is the association already with cc-by and cc-by-sa?
• What about the (imo) unfortunate misuses of the word? (e.g. Peter Suber's in the context of Open Access?).

• More

• History
• View source
• Link to

KTucker (talk)‎12:37, 9 August 2013

Would it make sense to have a "Libre" label/emblem on physical devices?

• History
• Summarize

If so, what would need to be true about the device and its design specifications?

• More

• History
• View source
• Link to

Ktucker (talk)‎12:22, 20 April 2009