Talk:Libre emblem

From WikiEducator
Jump to: navigation, search

Contents

Thread titleRepliesLast modified
Rather associate "libre" with libre resources not requiring attribution?011:37, 9 August 2013
Would it make sense to have a "Libre" label/emblem on physical devices?011:22, 20 April 2009

Rather associate "libre" with libre resources not requiring attribution?

e.g. ShareAlike 1.0 and a proposed update, CC0, PD, ....

Seeing the libre emblem means: when appropriate I must attribute, etc. - otherwise this resource is free to adapt, mix, ... (but do check if I need to preserve freedoms in my derived work - e.g. ShareAlike as above).

Thoughts anyone?

  • How strong is the association already with cc-by and cc-by-sa?
  • What about the (imo) unfortunate misuses of the word? (e.g. Peter Suber's in the context of Open Access?).
KTucker (talk)‎11:37, 9 August 2013

Would it make sense to have a "Libre" label/emblem on physical devices?

If so, what would need to be true about the device and its design specifications?

Ktucker (talk)‎11:22, 20 April 2009
Retrieved from "https://wikieducator.org/index.php?title=Talk:Libre_emblem&oldid=345123#Would_it_make_sense_to_have_a_.22Libre.22_label.2Femblem_on_physical_devices.3F_8527"