|Thread title||Replies||Last modified|
|Rather associate "libre" with libre resources not requiring attribution?||0||11:37, 9 August 2013|
|Would it make sense to have a "Libre" label/emblem on physical devices?||0||11:22, 20 April 2009|
e.g. ShareAlike 1.0 and a proposed update, CC0, PD, ....
Seeing the libre emblem means: when appropriate I must attribute, etc. - otherwise this resource is free to adapt, mix, ... (but do check if I need to preserve freedoms in my derived work - e.g. ShareAlike as above).
- How strong is the association already with cc-by and cc-by-sa?
- What about the (imo) unfortunate misuses of the word? (e.g. Peter Suber's in the context of Open Access?).