Activities for OpenVentures

Fragment of a discussion from Talk:OpenVentures
Jump to: navigation, search

Hi! I think this will be a tough find, since Open is conceptual, not something that exists with a structural framework. (Ps. I looked and could only find taxonomies for individual concepts e.g. open science).

Emenzies (talk)03:13, 28 June 2016

Hi Erin, Thanks for looking, I saw the Open science image that was added, it is great. You are right, taxonomy for Open is the wrong type of classification system. I do wish there was a way we could create some type of classification, or image for Open Everything in general. I am reviewing the Open Education Section, and we have at the top, Open Educational Resources, under which is Open Courses, and others. I wonder if we are confusing the issue with the ranking or headings. I think this is a minor point, and not one I am hung up on, just food for thought.

Bjamieson (talk)03:31, 30 June 2016

This actually might be a good question for the community - can the Open Venture Innovation categories be categorized differently? i.e. should Open Pedagogy exist within Open Education? Other ideas...?

Bjamieson (talk)08:44, 2 July 2016

I agree..... our classification seems good for our purposes, but does is also somwhat arbitrary. It is based on our personal interests and how we could divide up the work well. However, it also gives some decent chunking of the pieces we have.

Noan (talk)05:29, 5 July 2016

Yes, tackling categories for Open difficult when they overlap, i.e. Open Source could be an OER and vice versa. I was hoping there was a visual way to represent Open Everything, since so many people feel Open Source covers all aspects of the movement.

Bjamieson (talk)12:10, 5 July 2016