Activities for OpenVentures

Jump to: navigation, search

As we approaching our development process as an agile emergent design, I am now wondering if every subpage should have the kind of activity listed on it, so that participants are reminded that they can add, edit, discuss, etc. What do you think?

Also, in the introductory Background Open Everything pathway, I was wondering if we want to add a constructivist element to get a baseline of learner knowledge and make them aware of what they know so they can measure what they subsequently learn from our Open Venture wiki?

Bjamieson (talk)04:01, 14 June 2016

Yes, absolutely! I think that a quick intro video tutorial should go on our frontpage, and then we can reference this video in future sections.

Noan (talk)03:43, 22 June 2016

Noan, great idea. If we can get a video produced ;)

Bjamieson (talk)07:12, 23 June 2016
 

Wondering if anyone has come across a taxonomy for the Open movement - an all of the interrelated components...?

Bjamieson (talk)07:11, 23 June 2016

Hi! I think this will be a tough find, since Open is conceptual, not something that exists with a structural framework. (Ps. I looked and could only find taxonomies for individual concepts e.g. open science).

Emenzies (talk)03:13, 28 June 2016

Hi Erin, Thanks for looking, I saw the Open science image that was added, it is great. You are right, taxonomy for Open is the wrong type of classification system. I do wish there was a way we could create some type of classification, or image for Open Everything in general. I am reviewing the Open Education Section, and we have at the top, Open Educational Resources, under which is Open Courses, and others. I wonder if we are confusing the issue with the ranking or headings. I think this is a minor point, and not one I am hung up on, just food for thought.

Bjamieson (talk)03:31, 30 June 2016

This actually might be a good question for the community - can the Open Venture Innovation categories be categorized differently? i.e. should Open Pedagogy exist within Open Education? Other ideas...?

Bjamieson (talk)08:44, 2 July 2016

I agree..... our classification seems good for our purposes, but does is also somwhat arbitrary. It is based on our personal interests and how we could divide up the work well. However, it also gives some decent chunking of the pieces we have.

Noan (talk)05:29, 5 July 2016

Yes, tackling categories for Open difficult when they overlap, i.e. Open Source could be an OER and vice versa. I was hoping there was a visual way to represent Open Everything, since so many people feel Open Source covers all aspects of the movement.

Bjamieson (talk)12:10, 5 July 2016
 
 
 
 
 

Noan, saw your note about doing a video to get people engaged quickly. Great idea. While I think the learning curve to participate in the wiki might be steep, it immerses our cohort into open practice and open content/OER. Briar

Bjamieson (talk)03:48, 27 June 2016

Yes... I have the video. I will upload it this morning, and then add a link to the "activity template". I played around with embedded video and it was really a lot harder than I thought. Then again, I have rarely had the chance to watch video through Wikipedia. I wonder if that will change in the future?

Noan (talk)04:08, 28 June 2016

Saw the video! Lovely, thank you!

Bjamieson (talk)03:18, 30 June 2016