Talk:Workgroup:Amendments to Open Community Governance Policy
- [View source↑]
- [History↑]
Contents
| Thread title | Replies | Last modified |
|---|---|---|
| Concerns! | 0 | 02:12, 29 April 2010 |
| An excellent charter! | 1 | 00:06, 27 April 2010 |
| Signatures | 1 | 02:30, 19 October 2009 |
I don't know why my content was deleted, so I would like to apologize if my entry on the blog was inappropriate or in the wrong place.
Here is the information I had added to the blog:
- I would love to help but I feel overwhelmed by the number of pages. I wonder if others feel the same. Perhaps, we could create a poll to find out if that's the reason for the low response. --Nellie Deutsch 05:58, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
Kim,
That's an excellent charter -- I don't have any suggestions for changes and as such will append my signature for approval.
Great to see this workgroup moving forward with an important community task.
Cheers
I created a separate table for Approval signatures, as there are likely to be more of us wanting to "sign" who haven't previously participated in the workgroup. It was a challenge trying to get my signature in the appropriate column in the original table.
I left the original table, because it contains "signatures" although some may actually be in the wrong column.
Many thanks. I removed the second column of the members table (seemed tidier) but later reinstated it and Wayne clarified the wording. Further comment in this thread.
