Talk:Ideas4Content Page
- [View source↑]
- [History↑]
Contents
| Thread title | Replies | Last modified |
|---|---|---|
| Classification is important | 0 | 07:12, 28 December 2007 |
| Category tags | 1 | 21:12, 17 December 2007 |
Dear Brent,
Please also look at the following site:
http://www.library.umass.edu/catalog/class.html
We need to suggest that each page created in WikiEd should have Category. The category may be of 3 types, adn as many in each category be given by the page creator. Giving category should be a compulsory activity. The three types of categories are:
- Subject heading as per a taxonomy decided (Only approved terms from the list to be used)
- Document Usage Type (e.g. Book, Article, Handout, distance learning material)
- Nature of Document (e.g. Review, Opinion, Lesson, Curriculum)
Sanjaya --Missan 19:12, 27 December 2007 (CET)
I use category tags to sort things by grade. The categories can then function as a search term to bring up all of the things for one grade level: first grade for example
Now, for the wiki magicians: if you can come up with a way to combine categories (for example 'biology' and 'first grade'), then category pages could function as Boolean searches for subject AND grade level AND resource type (lesson plan, image, etc).
A consistent list of category tags would be needed for this all to work. In the absence of the Boolean idea, a table of categories could be established:
| Subject | Grade 1 | Grade 2 | Grade 3 |
| Biology | Biol1 | Biol 2 | Biol3 |
| Poetry | Poet1 | Poet2 | Poet3 |
Generators of content could liberally sprinkle in the categories that best described their content.Dmccabe 04:08, 19 November 2007 (CET)
see: http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Help:Category#Subcategories might be what you're after.
