Difference between revisions of "Creative Commons unplugged/License compatibility: Example 4"

From WikiEducator
Jump to: navigation, search
m
m (edit)
Line 14: Line 14:
 
* Which of the following licenses could be used for the derivative work:
 
* Which of the following licenses could be used for the derivative work:
 
** All rights reserved Copyright
 
** All rights reserved Copyright
***'''Incorrect'''. All rights reserved could potentially be used for generating profit and would contravene the NC restriction.
+
***'''Incorrect'''. Not a compatible remix.
 
** CC-BY
 
** CC-BY
***'''Incorrect'''. The NC restriction on the photo would not permit the derivative worked to be licensed as CC-BY.
+
***'''Incorrect'''. Not a compatible remix.
 
**Released under a public domain declaration
 
**Released under a public domain declaration
***'''Incorrect'''. The attribution requirements of CC-BY and the NC restriction would not permit this.
+
***'''Incorrect'''. Not a compatible remix.
**BY-NC
+
**GNU FDL
***'''Correct''' The derivative work can be released under the same restriction of the most restricted license in the pack. There are however other alternatives as well.
+
***'''Incorrect'''. Not a compatible remix.
 
**BY-NC-ND
 
**BY-NC-ND
***'''Correct'''. It is possible to release this aggregation under a more restrictive license by adding the ND restriction. However, where possible we recommend that remixers try to respect the intentions of the original creators, especially where no new or original materials have been added.
+
***'''Incorrect'''. Not a compatible remix.
 
**BY-NC-SA
 
**BY-NC-SA
***'''Correct'''. It is possible to release this aggregation under a more restrictive license by adding the SA restriction. However, where possible we recommend that remixers try to respect the intentions of the original creators, especially where no new or original materials have been added.
+
***'''Incorrect'''. Not a compatible remix.
 
**BY-SA
 
**BY-SA
***'''Incorrect'''. The NC restriction of the photo would necessitate the inclusion of the NC restriction. The SA license does permit commercial activity for value-added services on condition that the derivative work is also released under a share alike license.}}  
+
***'''Incorrect'''. Not a compatible remix.}}  
 
<small>This is a remix inspired by the online version of David Wiley's [http://opencontent.org/game/betagame.html OER remix game].</small>
 
<small>This is a remix inspired by the online version of David Wiley's [http://opencontent.org/game/betagame.html OER remix game].</small>
 
|}
 
|}
  
 
{{Note:Insert previous next arrows as appropriate. --[[User:Mackiwg|Wayne Mackintosh]] 08:13, 3 November 2010 (UTC)}}
 
{{Note:Insert previous next arrows as appropriate. --[[User:Mackiwg|Wayne Mackintosh]] 08:13, 3 November 2010 (UTC)}}

Revision as of 04:19, 4 November 2010



OER Remix Game 4th Hand.png
Icon qmark.gif
Try your luck with this hand
  • Can these resources be aggregated and legally released as a derivative work?
    • Yes
      • Incorrect. The share-alike licenses (GNU FDL and CC-BY-SA) require that the derivative work be released under the same license, and the GNU FDL and CC-BY-SA license are legally incompatible in this example.
    • No
      • Correct. While the GNU FDL and CC-BY-SA licenses are both "copyleft" licenses, the legal code of both licenses require that derivative works are released under the same license.
  • Which of the following licenses could be used for the derivative work:
    • All rights reserved Copyright
      • Incorrect. Not a compatible remix.
    • CC-BY
      • Incorrect. Not a compatible remix.
    • Released under a public domain declaration
      • Incorrect. Not a compatible remix.
    • GNU FDL
      • Incorrect. Not a compatible remix.
    • BY-NC-ND
      • Incorrect. Not a compatible remix.
    • BY-NC-SA
      • Incorrect. Not a compatible remix.
    • BY-SA
      • Incorrect. Not a compatible remix.



This is a remix inspired by the online version of David Wiley's OER remix game.

{{Note:Insert previous next arrows as appropriate. --Wayne Mackintosh 08:13, 3 November 2010 (UTC)}}