User talk:Vtaylor/Computers and Society/CIS2 Summer 2018/Group 1
- [View source↑]
- [History↑]
Contents
| Thread title | Replies | Last modified |
|---|---|---|
| Johnathan Bounleuth - Group Project Individual Lists "placeholder" | 0 | 20:54, 8 August 2018 |
Individual List for the Group Project
Privacy and Freedom of Speech Best #2
https://searchsecurity.techtarget.com/definition/multifactor-authentication-MFA
1. Although multifactor-authentication (or MFA for short) is a tedious process to go through to access your information or any type of account, we should applaud it for allowing only the original owner do so, (if the individual does in fact have all the credentials). In the article by TechTarget, they state that multifactor-authentication works to ,"...create a layered defense and make it more difficult for an unauthorized person to access a target such as a physical location, computing device, network or database. If one factor is compromised or broken, the attacker still has at least one more barrier to breach before successfully breaking into the target." (TechTarget). MFA, typically uses a 2 or 3 step process with the first step being your password to the account. Then it gets more complex with biometric scans, USB keys, location factor, two-step factor, etc. I've had my experience with MFA multiple times, and the recent one would have to be accessing and trading cryptocurrency.
I chose this link because of how it correlates to the topic of privacy. Multi-factor authentication can be found in many trading sites and e-markets. It is also used for access sensitive information and documents. MFA is allowing users to safe-keep any type of information about themselves away from an unauthorized breach, and we'll see it being used more in the future when the internet becomes more complex and users become more vulnerable to attacks.
2. I came to the decision that I wanted to do this on information being sold on the internet without your consent because of the whole Facebook fiasco. I don't know if you watch tv but Facebook had this "I'm sorry for selling your information" apologetic-type advertisement/commercial. I sure as hell wasn't sold one bit. This came on to me about how quickly your internet security can be breach and your personal information being taken from you without you even knowing. Personally I've had many cards drained out from theft, and it's always funny seeing their transactions when you view your banking statement. It sort of hurts also, because you know you'll have to go through customer service and all that just you getting your money back and get a new card. In the article called "Here's How Much Your Personal Information Is Selling for on the Dark Web" by Brain Stack, it shows an in-depth chart categorizing how much your information is selling fro on the dark web based on what type of information it is. Whether its your credit card information, identification card(s), diplomas, passports, etc, someone is able to get a hold of it and sell for a pretty penny. Are we doing too little to protect or information of the internet? Since it seems that mostly everything is quite accessible to criminals and our security infrastructure is probably out dates (though I'm sure there are hard working individuals protecting us).
I've chosen this resource to spread awareness on the fact that some users information may have been accessed and stolen by a certain individual and may be sold on the dark web. Information being sent around the internet spreads very quickly, so it'll be unnoticeable to the individual affected sometimes. As much as you try to secure your information, there will always be someone a step ahead of you. Just be aware of the possibility that your information may have been exploited, and carry on the necessary procedures to prevent any more mishaps.
Intellectual Property Best #2
https://www.quora.com/How-does-technology-affect-art
1. When we think about art we tend to traditionally think of paint and a canvas, right? Well we typically view canvas painting as the "old medium" for art. As we've been trotting through the age of technology, we've come across an art form that combines the technologies of the computers and art birthing "digital art. How has art changed during the age of the internet you say? Well you can say it has branched out into many appearances such as photography(Instagram), videography(YouTube), visual arts (Photoshop), etc. On the question asking webpage Quora, someone asked, "How does technology affect art?", someone named Afzal Ibrahim answered, "Most kinds of visual arts - from films and photographs to the museum paintings - are now being presented and circulated online. While you will still have your classic galleries in some urban scenarios, most artists find that it's much easier for new creations to gain attention through the internet." (Ibrahim). The internet makes it more accessible to for artists to showcase their pieces through many different networking sites, which means it's also more available for consumers to look for it. Ibrahim also mentions there's programs and softwares that digital content creators can use to make works of art. There are various social media websites content creators or artists can use to advertisement their work and sell them.
I chose this link because we tend to think visual arts or painting has become a dying form within society because of the advancement of technology. But technology has actually revolutionized the way we consume certain art forms. With the many types of technologies out such as Photoshop, Illustrator, and Premiere artists are able to create amazing pieces of artwork that traditional paint and canvas probably wouldn't be able to imagine doing. With the growing age of the internet it is even more beneficial to artists because with the various social networking sites it has to offer, their work will be able to be posted for their audiences and this may help out with their bills that need to be taken care of.
https://opensource.com/resources/what-open-source
2. The two keywords I've chosen are "Creative Commons" and "open-source". Creative Commons is a site that I've known for quite a while during my period of being in a multimedia class. That was our go-to website in terms of looking for media to use that has been allowed by owners to be used freely. According to the Wikipedia page on Creative Commons focus is, "....expanding the range of creative works available for others to build upon legally and to share. The organization has released several copyright known as Creative Commons licenses. free of charge to the public. These licenses allow creators to communicate which rights they reserve, and which rights they waive for the benefit of recipients or other creators." (wikipedia). Creative Commons does not overrule copyright but intends to simplify its various licensing for users to understand what is readily available for them to use for creative purposes. In the online article called "What is open source?" from the website by Online Source they define it as, "...refers to something people can modify and share because its design is publicly accessible." (OpenSource). In relation to computers, there are programmable software that are "open-sourced" which means that the consumer is able to modify to their use. Open source software is a good source for people who need some foundation in order to guide them through what they would like a program to execute.
Open Source and Creative Commons both are sites providing free to use and modify creative works and software programs. This provides a foundation for users who are needing a first bump within their creative projects. Sometimes resources provided by Creative Commons and Open Source are exactly was creators are looking for that fits perfectly with their ideas drawn. What is perfect about these sites are that anything posted are available for everyone and are fully modifiable. I remember using these sites in in my Multimedia class back in high school and they helped pave the way for my projects. Sometimes you just need that first stepping stone, and they have always done it for me.
Crime Best #2
https://www.wired.com/2013/03/what-to-do-after-youve-been-hacked/
1. As an individual who have been hacked multiple times whether its through gaming, banking, or just web surfing, it can get quite frustrating getting back on your ten toes (or nine if you've lost one). This online article on Wired called "What to Do After You've Been Hacked" by Mat Honan is by far the most reasonable approach on how to act after it has happened. There's a few tips listed but I will briefly speak on a two that I find very useful. "Ask yourself why", (Honan). This a the best place to initially start your investigation to narrow down where you might have went wrong. Whether you were online shopping on sketchy websites, "watching movies" (your own representation), or downloading files, there must be a reason for why you've been attacked. If you can narrow down what was it you can find out what has been targeted, money or information. "De-authorize all those apps", (Honan). This has to be the most simple approach as it will stop anymore attacks from happening if you just deactivate any of your accounts to web pages or social media networks. Also, changing your password may help prevent anymore accesses from others, but make sure it's not predictable.
This is useful information for anyone who has every had their information stolen from them and needs some guidance in order to recover from such an attack. The article provides the audience with logical reasoning and advice that may assist in figuring out where the source of the breach may have happened. This will help many individuals that are still using the same password for every account with little to no variety (Me). I have since then learned my lesson and now fully aware of how to proceed if I was ever hacked again.
https://www.cnet.com/news/apple-vs-fbi-one-year-later-still-stuck-in-limbo/
2. One of the biggest questions is should the authority have access to an individual's (not guilty until proven) electronic device without their consent? What I'm saying is that without a search warrant it would be unlawful for authorities to force or hack their way into access your private data within the electronic device. Apple's refusal to cooperate with the FBI post terrorist attack in San Bernardino had people questioning which side is in the right. Of course people would want to find out the information contained in the phone of the deceased terrorist in order look for the motives or if anyone else is connected to the event. But, on the other hand it would be an invasion of someone's privacy since the owner of the device would not be the one allowing the search. Apple has done the most to protect your privacy, preventing authorities from having the right to brute force or hack your devices. If you guys have ever followed the stories between the Apple and FBI, you would know that the FBI managed to unlock the device but not with the assistance of Apple. They had a hacker unlock it which violates privacy right s and the FBI's excuse was that they managed to unlock it by themselves. My question is how would you feel if someone was able to access your information without your consent? Them hacking into your devices in order to gather evidence against you for a charge (hypothetically)? Do you believe it is right that whether or not an individual is a criminal, are the authorities allowed to access your devices unlawfully?
This article gives some insight on an ethical issue regarding the access to your information with or without your consent. The article gives an example with the event of the San Bernardo shooting that occurred where the suspect ended up deceased. The FBI wanted to gather information on the suspect's cellular device, an iPhone, but they were not able to access because of a pass code protective the owner's information. Apple refused to assist the FBI with unlocking the phone because it violates privacy laws enacted. So the question is should the government body or any authority have the right to search or access you information on a locked device without the owner's consent?
Employment, Education, and Entertainment Best #1
https://stemworks.wested.org/engineering-elementary
1. The website shows an engineering plan for K-8. It lists its target "...teachers/education leaders...students..." (Stemworks). The program for K-8 engineering is called "Engineering in Elementary". The site states that the program, "EiE has created a research-based, standards-driven, and classroom-tested curriculum that integrates engineering and technology concepts and skills with elementary science topics." (Stemworks). EiE's objectives are, "(1) increase children's technological literacy, (2) increase elementary-school educators' ability to teach engineering and technology, (3) increase the number of schools in the U.S. that include engineering at the elementary level, and (4) conduct research and assessment to further the first three goals and contribute to knowledge about engineering teaching and learning at the elementary level." (Stemworks). The program cost about $20,000 to support about 400-500, and the cost varies depending on the increase size of the school according the website.
This article provides information for the topic of how technology and the internet has affect society from an education standpoint. We are now seeing programs or supplemental packages created by companies that will "(1) increase children's technological literacy, (2) increase elementary-school educators' ability to teach engineering and technology, (3) increase the number of schools in the U.S. that include engineering at the elementary level, and (4) conduct research and assessment to further the first three goals and contribute to knowledge about engineering teaching and learning at the elementary level." (Stemworks). The only issue I have about such programs is that they seem to focus more on profiting rather than helping kids gain such skills. Providing such programs for a school or the whole district can be very costly, you'd have to commit fully to the regiment if you'd like to see children learn these things.
https://www.atia.org/at-resources/what-is-at/
2. According to the Assistive Technology Industry Association webpage, assistive technology means, "...products, equipment, and systems that enhance learning, working, and daily livings for persons with disabilities." (ATIS). Assistive technology can be created for various needs. They all specialize in their specific tasks in order to help the individual with a disadvantage. A list of examples provided are; "...electronic devices, wheelchairs, walkers, braces, educational software, power lifts, pencil holders, eye-gaze and head trackers, and much more." (ASIT). Assistive technology primary objective is the help people with "...who have difficulty speaking, typing, writing, remembering, pointing, seeing, hearing, learning, walking, and many other things." (ASIT). Whatever the disability may be, there is probably an assistive device to accommodate the individual.
We are seeing an evolution is Assistive technologies that will benefit individuals with disabilities. Sooner or later people with disabilities will be able to go through their daily lives with ease just like any other individuals who has issues. With the advancement of medicine and technology Assistive tech may be what will stop any type of discrimination towards disabled individuals from happening. I always like to see inventors and engineers creating devices benefit a group within society that are fortunate enough to live their life the same as other people. Maybe this will be the solution, and maybe someday we'll see augmentations being incorporated also.
Midterm-Grand Challenges Best #1
https://futurism.com/calculations-fusion-energy-reality/
1. Science Alert's online article called, "New Calculations May Finally Make Fusion Energy a Reality" they state that the main issue with harnessing fusion reactions is how would you be able to have it produce more energy than it expends. A group of physicists found that an odd-looking spherical design would achieve their could, because apparently it is able to produce a higher amount of energy rather than reactor designs such as tokamaks or stellerators. (ScienceAlert). The article claims that the main difference between the sphere shape versus the other two is that it is able to generate heat with temperatures "200 times hotter than the center of the Sun." (ScienceAlert). They might be able to produce a reaction without having any radioactive waste left over. I think they are heading in the right direction with choosing a reactor design that allows a higher heat threshold because in order to have a reaction as similar as the Sun, you must replicate it. They can overachieve by heating up 200 times more than the core which is fascinating. I think they must prioritize zero radioactive waste when it comes to having a clean energy source.
The thought out having a renewable source of energy that is extremely efficient is always a fascinating topic. People do not realize how much resources are used and energy is needed to make electricity to provide for everyone. We'd also have to take into consideration how it affect our carbon footprint on Earth, because our reliance of fossil fuels needs to be replaced before anything detrimental happens (climate change perhaps). Fusion energy is fairly difficult to replicate and the process to create solar energy will be to copy the exact procedure or event that happens on the Sun which is nuclear fusion. We can probably see the development of solar fusion plants in the near future, but the question is will it provide energy for the entire population including populations or groups around the world who haven't had acesss to electricity before.
2. In this online article called, "Fusion power plants could provide energy for homes in just 20 years" by John von Radowitz, he states that in just a little over 20 years fusion power will be able to provide clean limitless energy to homes. His source comes from scientists claiming that they're moving closely moving fusion technology towards commercial consumption. "Thirty-five nations are contributing to the International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor (Iter) being built at Saint-Paul-les-Durance in southern France." (Radowitz). The head of Itor's operations Dr. Bernard Bigot states that, "When we prove that fusion is a viable energy source, it will eventually replace burning fossil fuels, which are non-renewable and non-sustainable." (Radowitz). I suggest that they somehow focus on providing energy for key buildings first such as emergency service buildings, or traffic, then turn their heads towards providing energy for homes. They should come up with a way to have fusion energy be more mobile, such as having it power ships or aircrafts.
Upon further research on the topic of having solar energy or solar fusion as a source of energy for the future has had it's hiccups. The main issue with having solar energy is creating enough energy in order for it to be considered a commercial resource for the general population. The energy outputted is not sufficient enough to complete the task unless there is countless plants throughout communities. Producing fusion energy is a fairly difficult task in itself, but what would be more difficult is prying people away from electronic devices and technologies because you can infinitely use without any type of precaution.
Evaluating and Controlling Technology Best #1
1. In the online article called "A Simple Explanation Of "The Internet of Things" by Jacob Morgan, he simply puts the Internet of Things into words, "...this is the concept of basically connecting any device with an on and off switch to the Internet (and/or to each other). This includes everything from cellphones, coffee makers, washing machines, headphones, lamps, wearable devices and almost anything else you can think of." (Morgan). I'm assuming this has to do with the connectivity within the internet and technology. Basically anything that has an on/off switch can be connected to the Internet of Things. The article also states the "Internet of Things" is practically a giant network that will connect everything with anything, including humans. (Morgan). My question is does the internet of things represent the technological invasion within human society, and is it harmful in a sense that it stunt human evolution? This is my assumption because of the statement that everything will be connected to each-other somehow, even devices or household items that don't seem to be technologically advanced (blender, or a refrigerator).
This is an interesting topic because it is actually happening around us as we speak. All of our devices, whether if it's electronic or not will sooner or later be all connected to each other. The reason why, we don't know. Only think we know is that someone is gathering all the data and information being sent out from these devices that are connected. The scary thing is how we are normalizing the idea of the Internet of Things. How can we see that it is okay to network anything and everything around us into a huge web. We don't know if the information sent out will be important but it may influence how companies will cater to the consumers' needs and will probably have you wrapped around their fingers. This is an eye opening article to be discussing.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Automation
2. According to the Wikipedia page on automation it is defined as, "the technology by which a process or procedure is performed without human assistance... or automatic control is the use of various control systems for operating equipment such as machinery, processes in factories, boilers and heat treating ovens, switching on telephone networks, steering and stabilization of ships, aircraft and other applications and vehicles with minimal or reduced human intervention." (Wikipedia). In correlation to the course, automation can range from a control system operation a ship or a machine with little or no human assistance. Which means with the advancement of automation you'll see more technologies equipped with automated tools in order to make our society efficient and our lives a bit easier. But it may be at a cost of losing a huge chunk of a the human workforce.
With the advancement of technology soon we will be see some human jobs in production and in the factories be replaced with more efficient robots. But not to worry too much, because companies will still need people to oversee the robots during their working hours. This may cause a shift in what type of profession or field you'd have to pressure as hard labor will be going to automated technologies. We should not see this as a negative trend going on in the world, because there will always be jobs created as society evolves into an already advance civilization.
Risks, Failures, and Responsibilities Best #1
https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/medical-profession-is-underutilizing-computer-technology/
1. Okay, so here we have an online article called, "Medical Profession is Underutilizing Computer Technology" by Steven Novella (he went to medical school). He talks about how information technology within the medical field aren't what they had imagined it to be and that is why such profession occasionally rely on such technologies. A topic he mentions is having access to information. While there are many medical databases and case studies online that are universally available for users, something that is not universally available or readily available for employees are patients records. What i mean by patients records, I mean as if they were looking all all their information and records from other hospitals. That information will be blocked unless they get an approval from the hospital or office. The information is not available online, the individual must get it either through mail or a fax with takes too much times and is inefficient. Another technology that was suppose to help immensely are Electronic Medical Records (EMR). A quote from the article, "Electronic medical records (EMRs) were supposed to improve the practice of medicine, increase efficiency, improved outcomes, reduce errors, and decrease costs." (Novella). The issue with the EMR was that the user interface made it extremely difficult for employees to navigate and the response time was also an issue. It was not efficient within the workflow of the hospital or offices. I personal do believe that the advancement of technology will be beneficial to medicine. It will improve an individual's life in different ways. The issue is the communication between tech and medicine. They need to collaborate properly in order to produce a product that is most applicable and efficient on the floor. My question is that why hasn't this has been address soon enough? You know that there is countless flaws with the product given, how is it not taken back to the drawing board and reconstructed? Is there a language barrier between people in technology and medicine, for that to be the reason there are issues with the computers?
Typically we'd think that hospitals and doctors have easy access to a patient's information or that the equipment provided to the doctors are advanced and well equipped for the job. Well that's not the case for computer technology within the medical world. Programs such as the Electronic Medical Record were meant to be an efficient tool that the doctors will have on the floor that will assist in providing information on the patient's history and any type procedures. That was not the case as it seems that the user interface was fairly difficult to navigate even for the average doctor or nurse. Also the processor or memory have have been low spec as the response times on the machines have proven to become as issue for the nurses and doctors.
2. This online article called "What is internet addiction, internet dependency?" by Natasha Tracy briefly defines it as, ""Any online-related, compulsive behavior which interferes with normal living and causes severe stress on family, friends, loved ones, and one's work environment. Internet addiction has been called Internet dependency and Internet compulsivity." (Tracy). What we don't realize is that some individuals including ourselves are more and more dependent on such technologies and we may not even notice it. For example, some may not consider the usage of GPS on your phone as using the internet but it is. People are depending on an online map in order to help them guide themselves around town without paying attention to the actual street names and building to get a more nature instinct.
After a while of rejecting internet addiction as an actual disease, I've come to admit that this might be sometime that we need to take seriously as we get further into the future as it'll hold technological advancements along with the maturation of the internet. I used to thing that you can just turn on the device or pry it away from an suspected addicted user, but their dependency on the internet does affect their behavior in reality. You'd find it a little bit difficult to communicate with them. Why haven't we taken this disease seriously because it seems like there may be a correlation between internet dependency and depression. I hope I'm not stretching this claim too thin.
Anytime, Anywhere Best #2
1. The TED Talk I've chosen for this particular topic is Gary Liu's "The Rapid Growth of the Chinese Internet and Where It's Headed". The social issue discussed is providing internet and technologies for the poorer communities within China provided them with opportunities that will allow them to climb of the social ladder. An issue was providing a proper education for children who had trouble with transportation in certain communities. Since there is an issue with traveling campuses for schooling, a tech start up in Shenzhen now has about 55 million students live streaming classes. The plan is to use whatever alternative fuel is being created (solar fusion for example) to power technologies within poorer communities in order give children an opportunity to have an education.
This is an extremely monumental step for the Chinese. Keep in mind that they have quite a large population and the majority of the population do not have access to internet. With the Chinese pushing to provide internet access across their country, allowing children to receive adequate education via online classroom. We may see China taking the leading in transforming their country into a technology advance state because we know the push for new ideas will be coming. The main objective is to provide energy in certain communities who are far or isolated in order to provide schooling for children. This is a step in the right direction for humanity.
https://www.gravitatedesign.com/blog/what-is-geolocation/
2. Very informative content. Objective. Information is is given based on the topic of each section, so it is very organized and easy to read. There is no visual representation, but the overall layout of the website has a very clean finish. Now this is proper example of an article that gives a definition for geolocation and an explanation of it's usage. In this online article called "What is Geolocation?" by Aine McCarthy she gives a more reader friendly definition for the reader, "...it refers to the geographical (latitudinal and longitudinal) location of an Internet-connected device. Not your location, mind you, but the location of whatever electronic medium is being used to access the Internet." (McCarthy). Yes people keep in mind that geolocation does not track your physical location in terms of you as an individual. It is keeping track of the location of the device that is being used. For example if you have a phone on you and you are using the navigation program. It will show the devices location, but you'd happen to be using the phone .McCarthy goes on to gives an explanation of why it is useful, "the government and police use it for security purposes, such as unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) or ankle bracelets, which — when you think about the fact that neither type of data collection is precise — raises some unsettling implications. But, on the lighter side, some companies use it to change the way we play games by combining it with augmented reality (interacting with virtual elements based on geolocation), like Ingress and Pokémon Go." (McCarthy). Keep in mind that there are three ways geolocation can work, and it is based on data-collection. The three are: device based data collection, server based data collection, and combined data collection. If you want to know more about each of the three types, go ahead and go onto the link I provided and it'll take care of you.
Geolocation is beneficial in terms having it as a tool to guiding you to your next destination. Other then that companies and businesses typically use geolocation in order to collect information on your behaviors and routes you take in order to find marketing strategies in order to influence how you shop. It is a smart technique I may add. Do not worry as they will not be physically tracking you, only the device you are equipped with.
Technology, Advances, Social Trends Best #1
https://www.thetech.org/2017-laureates
1. I believe Path will make a huge impact towards a greater number of people. According to their website, Path is "...a global team of innovators working to accelerate health equity so all people and communities can thrive. We advise and partner with public institutions, businesses, grassroots groups, and investors to solve the world’s most pressing health challenges." (Path). According to the Tech Awards website, it states that they reach more than 150 million in 70 countries each year. "Our team includes scientists, health professionals, business leaders, engineers, advocates, and experts from dozens of other specialties. We work in more than 70 countries to transform bold ideas into sustainable solutions that improve health and well-being for all." (Path). I believe they are organized enough and have the correct personnel in order to achieve their goal of providing proper health for countries that don't have adequate health care system or resources.
Providing adequate health care for countries and communities who do not have the resources is always a step in the right direction for humanity. What is really good about the organization Path is that is it comprised of "scientists, health professionals, business leaders, engineers, advocates, and experts from dozens of other specialties", so you understand that there are professionals working in their specialized field in order to provide solutions for medical care and resource to replace the faulty systems previously implemented by another institution or governing body.
https://www.newgenapps.com/blog/iot-statistics-internet-of-things-future-research-data
2. Since we've previously had a module talking about the topic of The Internet of Things, I thought I share a link giving a graph predicting how many devices will be connected within the next seven years. This spans from 2015 to 2025. Keep in mind that the number is in the billions in terms of the amount of devices projected to be connected. The data given may seem like that will be the exact number of devices created but it's all just estimated, we won't be able to take into consideration all devices in the world. Currently we're at about 23 billion devices connected to the "internet of things".
This is an amazing statistic that needs to be taken into consideration, because we have previously spoken about the Internet of Things before and we couldn't figure out why it would be a good reason to connect anything and everything together and there aren't quite any benefits to doing so. It is projected that by 2025 there will be about 75 billion device connected to each other.Does that not alarm you that in less than ten years the amount of devices connected will increase three times than it was in 2015? Who keeps tabs on all the devices connected to each other because I know for a fact that the estimated number will not be the actual number, that will be impossible to calculate considering that people can be very sly about certain things under the table.
