Various
In a browser the user can change text size while browsing. So, small tags not needed.
Good luck with the printed version.
Perhaps keep the column flexible and provide any available info that might help characterise the site.
e.g. number of resources, number of registered users, edu level focus, "rigorous quality control", "ocw-like", "wiki-approach", etc. - so it is not really an attempt to "rate" or compare, just a little more than the description.
For this edition, the fact we have listed it means it is worth looking at.
>>e.g. number of resources, number of registered users, edu level focus, "rigorous quality control", "ocw-like", >>"wiki-approach", etc. - so it is not really an attempt to "rate" or compare, just a little more than the >>description.
I'm going to experiment with type of repository e.g. "wiki-approach" "OCW-like" etc. I'll have to see how it goes.
>>Perhaps keep the column flexible and provide any available info that might help characterise the site.
Aesthetically the variable columns looked mismatched, so there's a tension between the two needs.
>>For this edition, the fact we have listed it means it is worth looking at.
I agree, that was the baseline for inclusion and part of the reason the All Rights Reserved/restricted access/traditional copyright repositories were included.
