Pre-proposal step?

Jump to: navigation, search

I added a paragraph to the discussion period section. Is there anywhere else you think should be altered for this purpose?

Jesse Groppi (talk)08:43, 2 September 2009

Sorry I didn't get to reviewing your revision until now. I just read over the whole policy, and it seemed to me that a mention of the discussion period could be made in the "Creating a proposal" section. I guess I'd just mention the idea that in some cases members will want to raise a topic for discussion without providing a stated guideline, additional info and examples (as suggested in the guideline template). The policy could then refer the reader to the more detailed explanation in the "Discussion period" section. This addition might help members who are new to the style guideline approval process feel more comfortable with proposing a topic for discussion.

Just some thoughts for consideration. (I realize that the policy has been tabled at the Council meeting that starts today--not great timing for suggesting changes. t's not a big issue and can certainly wait until later if you agree.)

And, Jesse, I just want to say this policy is really well done. I think it will serve us quite well going forward!

Alison

ASnieckus (talk)15:28, 9 September 2009

I think, because it isn't a substantive or significant change, it's just a clarification, I'll go ahead and add that to the section tomorrow. It's a great suggestion, Alison.

Also, thanks very much for the compliment, but save some of it for yourself, and the others that have help, especially Wayne!

Jesse

Jesse Groppi (talk)14:10, 10 September 2009
 

Argh. I think I picked a bad time to look at it (that's what I get for procrastinating). I'm not seeing anywhere I can smoothly add that in. I'm going to try again tomorrow, but in the mean time, why don't you have a go at it? I was thinking that the "recognising a need" section might be a good place, as well.

Jesse Groppi (talk)15:58, 11 September 2009

OK, I fussed around with the wording to integrate into the previous text the idea that we can start with a discussion and don't need a fully formed guideline to start the process. I ended up moving the rationale from the "Discussion period" section to the "Recognizing a need" section. I was pretty detailed in the "Creating a proposal" section (listing the sections that can be left blank) -- might be too much.

See what you think.

Also, I thought we should mention need to post a new proposed guideline to the main WE list in the "Creating a proposal" section (given reference to this in the "Discussion period" section), so I added that. I'm thinking that this could be done by suggester or facilitator? or should we say any member can do this?

ASnieckus (talk)06:49, 13 September 2009

Good work with the rewrite! According to what is in the draft policy, a new proposal would be announced by either the suggester or a facilitator. I wouldn't want to prevent another member from doing it, but I wouldn't want to encourage it because the member may not know all the appropriate information to include in the announcement, and would be unlikely to recognise a need to create a digest announcement (when more than one proposal needs it). A facilitator would recognise the need for a digest and know all the important info, whilst the suggester would know all the info and announcing his own proposal would alleviate the need for digest announcements. What do you think?

Jesse Groppi (talk)02:44, 30 September 2009

Thanks. Good, I think we should go with saying that either the suggester or facilitator will annoumce a new guideline.... It doesn't completely preclude someone else, just encourages one of these two.

ASnieckus (talk)13:23, 30 September 2009