Main Discussion for Today

Jump to: navigation, search

Hi - some constructive critisism from me. If need, we can talk individually later tommrrow on the points below

Victor - I have no problem with the content. Just a couple of housekeeping issues as follows: 1.“Practicalises” – Is this correct?...I could be wrong. 2.“There is not disability access policy and several of its structures remains to be tested” – Typo’s

Luisa 1. The first 3 articles do not state which companies – The names of the companies and a one liner background on them would help a reader.

Akachi 1. Got confused by the heading – “Contribution to Question 4 of MBL911K Assignment.” I evaluated it based on Question 4, which may be incorrect. This is a different question right?

Shumi/Utang I found some typo's on ours as well! - we will ammend. Final Referencing details to be completed.

Conclusion - Just a thought to keep in mind - are we sure this is a 70% - 80% assignment as we agreed at study school?

--Shumimlingo 19:00, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

Shumimlingo (talk)08:00, 9 March 2009

Thanks Shumi.

Yes COMSEC has no Diversity Policy Document. The organisation however has not beeen challeenged in any issuee of diversity either in the Commonwealth Tribunal or any law court.

Victor.mensah (talk)08:06, 9 March 2009