Final Comments on Marketing Draft Assignment

Jump to: navigation, search

I have not submitted comments yet. I however concure with most comments made. I beleive strongly that we need to up the questioniar response rate to about 25. This may require "duplication" of the responses of some questionairs in a manner not to skew the responses. We may be negatively affected in the long run if this is not done.

Victor.mensah (talk)06:07, 13 April 2009

I second Victor's idea, on my email today I expressed that concern, I believe there is no harm in doing that.--Luisaserra 18:10, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

Luisaserra (talk)06:10, 13 April 2009

I commented earlier on the same issue and I agree with you guys. Kago and Akachi can sort this out outside of Wiki (our official minutes!)--Shumimlingo 18:13, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

Shumimlingo (talk)06:13, 13 April 2009

Shumi's comments here are vital. Not too much details here on the "doctoring". Dont worry, we can clean up after we finish here before we attach as verbatim record.

Victor.mensah (talk)06:19, 13 April 2009

we tried to disguise it by using percentages, we were unable to solicit more responses sorry, but are you suggesting we Robert Mugabe the numbers?

Kay go (talk)06:12, 13 April 2009

Yes, the real african way to get to the right number, glad the picture is clear--Luisaserra 18:15, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

Luisaserra (talk)06:15, 13 April 2009

Kago i still strongly feel we are not doing ouselves a favour by failing to follow a simple basic requirement of availing the required number of respondents. How bad were the other two which made you guys disqualify them?

Hove (talk)06:16, 13 April 2009

Well, not really RM the numbers but "replicate" them evenly may do. Refer to Shumi's response above

Victor.mensah (talk)06:17, 13 April 2009

If the requirement is 25 then lets work on giving 25....'Mugabe-ing' seems a little extreme.

Utang (talk)06:18, 13 April 2009