Feedback thoughts and suggestions on the high-level logic model

Jump to: navigation, search

Hi Mokurai,

Thank you for your detailed feedback -- this is very useful.

Regarding semantic mapping, we will inevitably end up using international conventions, like those used by UNESCO. We will also consult with agencies like the International Network for Quality Assurance Agencies in Higher Education (INQAAHE) who work with these frameworks on a daily basis.

We are using a logic model framework -- which with most things in life have their advantages and disadvantages. Logic models can be a tad mechanistic and not widely used in the education sector. However, the do provide a useful framework with sufficient flexibility to accommodate the wide range of activities needed for a project of this complexity and scope.

I can see that the detail you have provided will be incorporated into the respective activities for each initiative. With reference to the impact bullets listed, this will need to be specified at the next level of detail of the logic model, i.e the KPIs for the impact level of the project. How will we know when we have achieved success and your impact bullets are what's needed for the next tier of detail. The current page is a very generic high-level summary - -we must still fill out the detail.

You have also identified the need for an activity in the logic model focusing on renewable electric power (possibly under the Open ICT Infrastructure initiativ)e. At the activity level of the logic model we will unpack the detail, outputs, KPIs, milestones and outputs for each activity.

Valuable feedback - thanks. -We will need to identify champions to convene the development of all the activities required for moving forward.

Mackiwg (talk)13:09, 14 March 2011