Assignment 1

1. Ackachi may simply be bluntly right here. I believe that with fewer subjects to handle, an all hands on deck may be better for us.
2. What we need is A LOT of time for review of documents and contributions from everybody to allow for more contributions and quality checks - most importantly with referencing too.

• Parent
• More

• History
• View source
• Link to

Victor.mensah (talk)‎05:45, 17 January 2011

Edited by author.
Last edit: 05:53, 17 January 2011

Ok.Although iam a bit late i think you would allow to contribute constructively. I think we just need to apportion sub groups and combine the individual sub groups contributions into a formal documents. However as highlighted above we have neglected the quality control part which we need to thoroughly do this time around However i think choosing the chairman and secretary could help us in that there will some sort of co-ordination.

• Parent
• More

• History
• View source
• Link to

Hove (talk)‎05:50, 17 January 2011

welcome Hove

• Parent
• More

• History
• View source
• Link to

Akachi Ngwu (talk)‎05:52, 17 January 2011

You have been quite my brother. How are doing and the family?

• Parent
• More

• History
• View source
• Link to

Hove (talk)‎05:56, 17 January 2011

 

Thanks Hove, this sounds quite practical. If I get you correctly, everyone should contribute to the assignment, but under subgroups. I think this may work and is in line with Akachi's suggestion. Do you have a suggestion for an Assignment leader & secretary for assignment 1--Shumimlingo 16:57, 16 January 2011 (UTC)

• Parent
• More

• History
• View source
• Link to

Shumimlingo (talk)‎05:57, 17 January 2011

 

the discussion is open for other members suggestion, i believe we need a bit lot of team work for the project

• Parent
• More

• History
• View source
• Link to

Akachi Ngwu (talk)‎05:50, 17 January 2011