Additional Criteria?

I'd like to suggest additional criteria, on the topics of language and audience -- I'm thinking these could go under content validity and fitness of purpose:

• the resource specifies the target audience.
• the tone (e.g., familiar or proper) and difficulty of language used to communicate learning materials is well suited to typical learners' needs and comfort level.
• the presentation material is written and organized such that complex content is easier to understand

I think WE could really benefit from identifying and featuring quality resources. I hope this process is able to move forward in the near future.

Alison

• More

• History
• View source
• Link to

ASnieckus (talk)‎11:03, 15 May 2009

Hi Alison,

These are valuable suggestions and there is no reason why we can't focus energies on identifying and featuring quality resources.

Thanks.

Cheers

• Parent
• More

• History
• View source
• Link to

Mackiwg (talk)‎22:31, 18 May 2009

Wayne,

Thanks for your thoughts on this. I'll add my suggestions to the criteria and keep an eye out for others who would like to work on getting a featured works process implemented. I'm willing to help.

Thanks, Alison

• Parent
• More

• History
• View source
• Link to

ASnieckus (talk)‎14:20, 20 May 2009