Talk:Workgroup:Categories/Current map
- [View source↑]
- [History↑]
Contents
| Thread title | Replies | Last modified |
|---|---|---|
| Tried out the process with letter "F" | 2 | 02:03, 1 October 2009 |
| Category ANDC | 1 | 04:53, 30 September 2009 |
A bit tedious, but I managed OK...I think. I did leave the notes about # of members left over from the copy and paste. Probably not needed.
Let me know if I missed something.
Hehe, yes, it's tedious, but it goes fairly fast. It's a process I've seen used and used myself on other wikis. This sort of thing isn't easily described in words!
Yeah, number of members isn't really needed. I was using the notes as an at-a-glance reference for the contents of the category. The idea is to suggest where the category might go, or any obvious issues, without having to visit all the pages. Some categories are easy to tell, some are difficult.
Dear Jesse,
I'm sorry that we have a category ANDC with nothing linked to it. We plan to link all pages created by the members of my college link their pages it to it.
Savithri
Savithri,
There's no need to apologise! I will be leaving notes on categories I'm unsure of what to do with, and you and your colleagues can use the work I've done to help you create the best structure for your own categories. Keep an eye out for workgroups involving category guidelines and style guidelines; the more voices the better.
