From WikiEducator
Jump to: navigation, search


Thread titleRepliesLast modified
Web Resources120:20, 30 September 2009
Wonderings019:52, 27 September 2009
PBL114:47, 27 September 2009
Wonderings image210:23, 27 September 2009

Web Resources

Hi I popped this template in here early on, it is not in the other modules. There we have used Bibliography as a heading. For consistency sake I'd suggest we use the template (gives the nice box with a heading) for later modules. I also want to delete the link to further readings as it has not been used for this module - again an experiment from early days ;-) Let me know what you think re Web Resources vs Bibliography. The direction from Ben was not prescriptive on this except to say he wouldn't recommend footnotes. H

Hmlamond (talk)05:40, 29 September 2009

Hi, still have a question about the further reading link here - it goes to a page with nothing on it, shall I just delete the link? H

Hmlamond (talk)20:20, 30 September 2009


Hi there,

The image is up - let me know what you think. We still need some questions....please ensure that the format for the instructions and questions follow that of Module 1 (Introduction). Thanks.

Heather, the frames look absolutely fantastic - you are a real whizz at this!

Kind regards Leigh (talk)19:52, 27 September 2009

Greater importance needs to be placed on the authentic context/big question. Will need to reinforce this in later modules I think the social aspect is catered for with group definition and class contribution to KWL T

Whaeatina (talk)14:23, 27 September 2009

I think I have addressed this but keen for anyone else to improve/refine T

Whaeatina (talk)14:47, 27 September 2009

Wonderings image

We need a photo and questions for this module H --Hmlamond 03:57, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

Hmlamond (talk)16:57, 26 September 2009

Hi Heather,

I added a photo, but can't centre the source underneath. Do you know how to do this?

Thanks Leigh (talk)22:15, 26 September 2009

Hi Leigh I have used the frame attribute for images throughout - I think it looks tidier and source then is obviously linked to the image. What do you think? Coding looks like this:

Image:xxxx.jpg|frame|left| URL source

Cheers H --Hmlamond 21:23, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

Hmlamond (talk)10:23, 27 September 2009