Difference between revisions of "Creating sustainable futures/CSF101/Defining sustainability/Models"
From WikiEducator
(Adding content) |
(changing images) |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The relationship between economic, social and environmental systems is usually shown in one of two ways: | The relationship between economic, social and environmental systems is usually shown in one of two ways: | ||
| − | + | [[image:WeakSustainability 01.jpg|300px]] | |
| − | In this graphic, the three systems are shown as separate yet connected systems. The point where all three circles intersect is referred to as the sweet-spot where outcomes are sustainable, by balancing the economic, social and environmental concerns. This model is sometimes referred to as “weak sustainability”. It tends to encourage trade-offs where economic objectives take priority over environmental and social objectives. | + | In this first graphic, the three systems are shown as separate yet connected systems. The point where all three circles intersect is referred to as the sweet-spot where outcomes are sustainable, by balancing the economic, social and environmental concerns. This model is sometimes referred to as “weak sustainability”. It tends to encourage trade-offs where economic objectives take priority over environmental and social objectives. |
| − | + | Some people, cynically, refer to it as the “Mickey Mouse” model, with reality looking more like this second graphic. | |
| − | {{IDevice|theme=line|type= | + | [[File:Micky Mouse Model.jpg|300px]] |
| − | # Take a moment to | + | |
| + | |||
| + | {{IDevice|theme=line|type=activity|title=Discussion forum activity|id=Activity|body= | ||
| + | # Take a moment to think about the above and consider the following questions: | ||
#* Do you agree with this model? | #* Do you agree with this model? | ||
#* How might it constrain or inform decision making to encourage decision-making that supported sustainability? | #* How might it constrain or inform decision making to encourage decision-making that supported sustainability? | ||
#* What do you think about the Mickey Mouse model? | #* What do you think about the Mickey Mouse model? | ||
#* Do you think it reflects the current, business-as-usual mindset towards sustainable practice? | #* Do you think it reflects the current, business-as-usual mindset towards sustainable practice? | ||
| − | # Write | + | # Write your answers in the [{{:Creating_sustainable_futures/Links/Discussion_forum_101}} Discussion Forum]. Look for the appropriate topic. |
}} | }} | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | {{:Creating_sustainable_futures/Links/WEnote}} | ||
Latest revision as of 14:04, 14 June 2016
The relationship between economic, social and environmental systems is usually shown in one of two ways:
In this first graphic, the three systems are shown as separate yet connected systems. The point where all three circles intersect is referred to as the sweet-spot where outcomes are sustainable, by balancing the economic, social and environmental concerns. This model is sometimes referred to as “weak sustainability”. It tends to encourage trade-offs where economic objectives take priority over environmental and social objectives.
Some people, cynically, refer to it as the “Mickey Mouse” model, with reality looking more like this second graphic.
