Review process templates
I like these templates... The template should include a place for the reviewers name and a link to their WE user profile. Should we assume that all reviewers need to have enough detail in their WE profiles to determine there appropriateness as a reviewer?
I guess we also need a featured works template for each of the five features works types. Sooo...
10. featured works (this template should include an attribute indicating which featured work it is. I'm wondering if the featured reuse, featured project and featured institution templates should make reference to all the resources included in their being selected as a featured works.)
Cheers, Peter --Peter Rawsthorne 22:17, 27 September 2008 (UTC)