I agree. I do think these headings are relevant at the begining stages of this initiative... But should be reworked as the QA matures...
I agree these are relevant in the beginning phases -- I just sense that they are subheadings of the main structure -- if you know what I mean ...
Thinking about this from an information design perspective, we have three key areas:
- First drafts
- Featured works
- Peer reviewed OER
- Capability -- i.e. the capability of individuals and organisations to produce quality OER
- How we do it -- i.e. process and supporting materials on how to do this
- Tools, e.g. the templates we'll use for requesting review as a featured item etc.
- Contribution levels
Research is a cross-cutter --- need to think where this fits into the strucuture
What do you think?