MBL 916Q Assignment 2.
We sent out the draft copy of the assignment on Wednesday, yet to recieve any comments from members
Akchi, I was not able to see it I travelled to Mbarara on Wednesday afternoon and I am only back this afternoon at home, apologies on that--Luisaserra 16:14, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
Luisa, that is okay. How about other members? my fear is that we might not have the time to start reworking on the assignment as the due date is on tuesday
JC, thanks but we are worried on the non response by members. Do we assume that the work is 100% okay. the assignment is due on tuesday August 25
Its due on Tuesday, therefore if we do not get any comments, we may take that as a yes to our document and start making plans with Victpor for the upload on Tuesday. I know we have talked about incorporating a graph, the question is where and what doe we takew off. Am still contemplating in my mind.
I believe that is the best option, please go ahead if you three are ok with the document--Luisaserra 16:18, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
utang suggest that the graph should be made in the appendix as we have exceeded the 10 pages max on the assignment
Parts 2 and 3 I am happy with as is, part 1 is where we need to reflect on areas of improvement. I am not sure if we have been succinct with our predictyion of the economic theory - i think we havent made our conclusion on the impact of theory on ENDAKA.
where do you think we are lacking on part 1, is it on the points highlighted?
The key questions on part 1 are - what does theory predict? Did it really happen? what did happen? We may need tro conclude on our theory in respponse to the questions. Perhaps a small concluding para to put everything in context. what do you thonk?
there is a concluding part on the part 1, may be read through it again. so u can flesh it up
pls do reflect on your thoughts so we can send it to victor by monday evening for uploading
