MBL 915 Assignment

Jump to: navigation, search

i assume, we have all managed to browse through the 3rd Draft, any comments?

Kay go (talk)07:14, 18 May 2009

Sorry guys I have been slow in my review. however I have the follwoing points to make: 1. 32 PAGES looks like its too long to me? How many pages is the limit / target? 2. The SWOT analysis is weak - we may need to do a table and sum up key points. I can add some points on that.

JEREMIAH CHAPHXANYA (talk)07:16, 18 May 2009

We are required to deliver a minimum of 20pages with no clear limit. The current document is 26 real peages. Your suggestion about the SWOT analisis will be helpful. When will that come in?

Victor.mensah (talk)07:19, 18 May 2009

I will do it tonight and send you a copy. You can polish it up.

JEREMIAH CHAPHXANYA (talk)07:22, 18 May 2009

thnaks JC

Victor.mensah (talk)07:30, 18 May 2009

l can submit my comments if there are any tomorrow l have problems with my yahoo today, l do not know why.--Shungunyoni 18:23, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

Shungunyoni (talk)07:23, 18 May 2009

Akachi, Shungu, Taurai any comments? thanks Jerry for for the contribution.

Kay go (talk)07:25, 18 May 2009

it seems everyone else is quite happy with the draft Victor. please if you do not have any comments kindly state "no comments" so we know that we are on the same page and can progress quicker

Kay go (talk)07:36, 18 May 2009

I think if we utilise a table that will be a ploy to reduce the length of the assignment, however i do not think that will give us the opportunity to put an indepth analysis of the environment as expected. Lets just focus on improving the way it is. It might be the flow of the information which has a problem. I going through the draft while participating on Wiki so i do no have much to contribute.

Hove (talk)07:39, 18 May 2009

Hove - point taken. I leave that to u guys to decide, all I aim to do is to expand and highlight key point on the swot analysis.

JEREMIAH CHAPHXANYA (talk)07:43, 18 May 2009

Thanks Kaygo, i guess that will be all the comments from members on this. As a note i will be doing final edits, remove all notes unclaimed/without sources and hoping to do final upload by 12noon moro GMT.

Thanks to you all.

Victor.mensah (talk)07:36, 18 May 2009

Akachi would like to know who is doing the QC on this assignment? Victor please advise; and remind him as well how the Wiki meetings structured...in terms of where to reply

Kay go (talk)07:40, 18 May 2009
Edited by another user.
Last edit: 07:44, 18 May 2009

Thanks Kaygo. I already did. Perhaps we can start the next agenda now? - the Economics SoW?

Victor.mensah (talk)07:43, 18 May 2009

who is doing the QC for the assignment?

Akachi Ngwu (talk)07:40, 18 May 2009

Unfortunatly, i beleive that will still be me. I will do the best i can as i have done so far. Any comments so far on the QC?

Victor.mensah (talk)07:43, 18 May 2009

just to confirm on the font size, spacing,referencing, etc

Akachi Ngwu (talk)07:45, 18 May 2009

Yes, ---- your comments on them please

Victor.mensah (talk)07:48, 18 May 2009

Jeremiah is right guys the SWOT analysis is not all that good,eg, where a definition of Opportunities is given it was given as if market offerings as broad as it is its an opportunity that is wrong.

Hove (talk)07:53, 18 May 2009

Hove - I will give it a go, and please can you review and add your comments so that we get this right. It is an area where we should maximise

JEREMIAH CHAPHXANYA (talk)07:57, 18 May 2009

I will do that Jeremiah. Thanx

Hove (talk)08:05, 18 May 2009

Spacing and font i think its fine. Not sure about referencing.

Hove (talk)07:49, 18 May 2009

we are working together on MBL916Q. How do we approach it?

Akachi Ngwu (talk)07:49, 18 May 2009