EPM Assignment Part b

My intention was to use the formart agreed at Study School. Unfortunately I have been getting documents in different format, and no-one has clarified to me what the group agreed, if any at all. I also would prefer tables than narrative format.

• Parent
• More

• History
• View source
• Link to

JEREMIAH CHAPHXANYA (talk)‎05:29, 2 May 2011

Guys you can not put those twenty something points in a table. Those were the factors that we identified that affected PF. If you need to use graphs and/ or tables then you will need to use then on the EPM fundamentals positioning NC and the recommendations thereof

• Parent
• More

• History
• View source
• Link to

Hove (talk)‎05:34, 2 May 2011

Hove - pooint taken, but whichever way wego, we still need to streamline and keep the sections brief. We are addressing more than 20 PM fundemental, and we have to keep it up ro about 8 pages. We may need to carefully think about it both ways.

• Parent
• More

• History
• View source
• Link to

JEREMIAH CHAPHXANYA (talk)‎05:44, 2 May 2011

No JC.We only have 10 fundamentals that is chapter 1 to 10. Those 20 or so factors are the challenges that were identified.

• Parent
• More

• History
• View source
• Link to

Hove (talk)‎05:49, 2 May 2011

 

 

JC, Originally that template was made as a summary to guide the Section 2 subgroups. I honestly haven't analysed how that section looks in tables. I can give an opinion later tonight. What do other members think so we can conclude the issue now. --Shumimlingo 16:36, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

• Parent
• More

• History
• View source
• Link to

Shumimlingo (talk)‎05:36, 2 May 2011

 

What then is our decision guys.Its the 4 of us only and we need to make that call now.

• Parent
• More

• History
• View source
• Link to

Hove (talk)‎05:47, 2 May 2011