EPM Assignment Part b

Any thoughts on the version presented in the draft? I have only exchnaged ideas with Calvin, the rest of the team has been quiet. Not sure if people reviewed it or not?

Are the 3 of you on skype right now? My name is admirechaps.

• Parent
• More

• History
• View source
• Link to

JEREMIAH CHAPHXANYA (talk)‎05:28, 3 May 2011

Guys Iam sorry iam late:

These are my recommendations:

1. Reduce the amount of tabular staff a little bit. 2. The first part is too long it needs to reduced. 3. We have focussed more on marking guidelines.Need to focus more onthe questions and addressing the guidelines. 4. Reduce the staff contained in the table. 5. JC had substantially reduced staff i think we should reduce further.

• Parent
• More

• History
• View source
• Link to

Hove (talk)‎05:40, 3 May 2011

Agreed Hove. My intention was

• Parent
• More

• History
• View source
• Link to

JEREMIAH CHAPHXANYA (talk)‎05:46, 3 May 2011

If you look on Calvin's staff he has added some and re-arranged the EPM fundamentals according to which one should come first. I think we should also reduce the first part to minimal lengths.Its way way to long.

• Parent
• More

• History
• View source
• Link to

Hove (talk)‎05:51, 3 May 2011

 

Agreed to reducing stuff in table, and adding a narrative section. Would have been nice to Calvin on board

• Parent
• More

• History
• View source
• Link to

JEREMIAH CHAPHXANYA (talk)‎05:51, 3 May 2011

Cool

• Parent
• More

• History
• View source
• Link to

Hove (talk)‎05:54, 3 May 2011