EPM Assignment - Deadlines

Jump to: navigation, search

1. Can we agree on deadlines for the initial draft to tomorrow?

2. Can every member ensure that they check their email and read the document, and make comments. Would be good for everyone to acknowledge so that we know we are in the right direction.

3. As professionals, I hope we take respoonsibility for our work and respect tyhe timelines.

JEREMIAH CHAPHXANYA (talk)05:18, 2 May 2011

JC, i have seen all the documents. Frankly however, i am a bit confused as to WHICH ONE should be our focus for comments right now. Am i being too naive? forgive me if i am.

Victor.mensah (talk)05:23, 2 May 2011

Victor - the missing sections from my latest version of the assignment is the submission by Hove( a few minutes b4 the meeting) and Luisa. The draft from Shumi has been included in my draft version. Therefore yu better focus on the latest email from me. I hope that helps. Thanks.

JEREMIAH CHAPHXANYA (talk)05:26, 2 May 2011

Thanks boss. Clearer now.

Victor.mensah (talk)05:38, 2 May 2011

Can we have all submissions in except Part C by 1 pm tommorrow SA time? Is that reasonable or too relaxed? --Shumimlingo 16:50, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

Shumimlingo (talk)05:50, 2 May 2011

Its ok for me but we need to agree on the format first. Part c should be done by 10am on Tuesday.What do you guys think.

Hove (talk)06:02, 2 May 2011

Hove - To be format is just a matter of presentation, which either way, will take as much space. Personally I prefer tables, to the point, and minimal narratives.

JEREMIAH CHAPHXANYA (talk)06:07, 2 May 2011

JC How then do we handle what has already been done in narratives. Luisa is travelling and I doubt we'll get her to convert to tables. Calvin's part I believe has been done in narratives (I stand to be corrected). Will someone convert? --Shumimlingo 17:13, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

Shumimlingo (talk)06:13, 2 May 2011

Shumi - Let me give it a go both ways and see what we come up with. I will need to summarise all these submissions into a 1 page per fundamental, include challenges, recommendatuions and justification.

JEREMIAH CHAPHXANYA (talk)06:19, 2 May 2011

This is fine for me. It will give us the afternoon to proof read. --Shumimlingo 17:14, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

Shumimlingo (talk)06:14, 2 May 2011

That sounds good.

JC, can you incorporate Hove's latest comments (and any that has just come in if any) right after here so that edits will be unified? I have seena few edits but will want to make them only once.

Victor.mensah (talk)06:07, 2 May 2011

Victor hasto be roped in for quality check. I thinkhe is the best.

Hove (talk)06:17, 2 May 2011