Consider mixed approaches, too? not just bipolar (closed/open)

Jump to: navigation, search

hm, the topic is brilliant and opening a wiki project here is, too. what do you think about considering more than just two options (opposed in a bipolar fashion)? i suggest we discuss mixed approaches, too. actually, looking into these might bring more pro/contra-arguments on the table, too. votes, please :-)

C.Koltzenburg (talk)21:15, 27 July 2010

+1 --Fabiana Kubke 11:04, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

Kubke (talk)00:04, 28 July 2010

thanks, see here (oops, now my reply here moved above Daniel's,let's see)

C.Koltzenburg (talk)22:06, 28 July 2010

Sure. I fully expected mixed approaches to be part of the Solution/ Outlook sections, but having them brought in earlier (after blacj and white are defined ;-) ) is fine as well. --Daniel Mietchen 12:56, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

Daniel Mietchen (talk)01:56, 28 July 2010

thanks, see here

C.Koltzenburg (talk)22:09, 28 July 2010

thanks, see here

C.Koltzenburg (talk)22:10, 28 July 2010

[ok, sorry, for my reply I just tested 3 different positions, none of which is actually satisfactory, I feel. Would it have been better without rich text - prefer non-rich-text anyway - I think it is not a good idea to have less fully developed wiki functions on the discussion page. But there most likely were reasons to do it this way - could someone point me to any page I could take this discussion to?]

C.Koltzenburg (talk)22:18, 28 July 2010