Jump to: navigation, search
Edited by another user.
Last edit: 07:09, 28 January 2011

Preserving a specimen via amber is a really good way to keep a lot of detail. It starts out as a resin that comes from coniferous trees (trees that produce their seeds in cones, i.e. pine trees), very much like a tree sap. As the resin surfaces on the branches or trunk, it hardens. This is a method the trees use for protection from predators such as insects or browsing of larger animals. It can also protect cuts or breaks that happen to the tree, acting as a shield from more outside harm while the tree repairs itself. The resin will engulf the insect (or whatever is destined to become a fossil) completely and then hardens around it, preserving whatever it is exact way it looks. For the resin to harden into the next stage, something called copal. This is harder and more durable than the hardened resin, but it can still be destroyed rather easily. It takes thousands of years (sometimes even millions) for the resin to become amber, and it needs the right set of conditions for it to preserve correctly. It needs a lack of oxygen, so it works best if it’s submerged in sediments under water or something like that. The oxygen will eat away at the resin. The terpenes (a large class of hydrocarbons often found in many coniferous trees) in the resin is what causes the substance to harden into amber, by chemically linking themselves, like they’re being fused together.

“The a classy piece of Baltic Oligocene amber trapping the best preserved spider in existence.”

"Amber." Fossil Preservation . Web. 27 Jan 2011. <>.

SkittyPaw (talk)06:13, 28 January 2011
Edited by another user.
Last edit: 06:07, 11 February 2011

An interesting detailed scenario about how this process occurs is located on this website,, under the heading "How are fossils formed?Amber".

This is an interesting site, with lots of information. however, be warned that it is a commercial fossil dealer's site and not a professional site, so the information presented on it has not been vetted as much as an academic site and may not be as reliable.

Ndwhitten (talk)15:31, 1 February 2011