A few thoughts on the peer evaluation proposal.

Fragment of a discussion from Talk:Peer Evaluation
Jump to: navigation, search

9. Rather than random assignment (which might be problematic with course dropout rates) an alternative might be a karma system:

  • that values being among the first n people to evaluate a submission (to reduce the chance of some submissions being reviewed at all)
  • that reduces the karma earned for
    • each review you do of a particular peer (reduces grading your friends)
    • each review you do of a particular assignment (discourages someone trying to review everyone)
JimTittsler (talk)16:53, 9 May 2014