Talk:Creating sustainable futures/CSF101/Sustainability is possible/Case for transformation
- [View source↑]
- [History↑]
Contents
| Thread title | Replies | Last modified |
|---|---|---|
| Changes from Alexa | 1 | 04:26, 22 May 2016 |
From the original draft: "The layout on this page refers to Session 1, 2, 3 and 4 - is this ok? From weds discussion I thought we needed to use the term pathway - or did i get this out of context? "The ecological, life-supporting systems of Earth have been in a balanced state of evolution for billions of years" I'm not sure this statement is entirely correct, Earth has been through many states and changes, the only difference with this one is that the changes made by humans mean that humans may not be able to survive in the next state. What do others think? Maybe a better way of getting this across might be: The ecological HUMAN life-supporting systems of Earth are threated by technical progress and development of modern industrial systems over the last 250 years, combined with rapid population growth. I've made minor changes to Session one and two. Just the above questions to be answered and dealt with, then these two are good to go :) Reply More Alexaforbes (talk)01:00, 29 April 2016"
