Quality Assurance in Multimedia Learning Materials/Analysis

From WikiEducator
Jump to: navigation, search

I ANALYSIS

Indicators

1.1 Needs are clearly stated and comprehensive.


1.
Poor : Needs are not stated and stakeholders are not defined.
2.
Average : Needs are somewhat clearly stated, but stakeholders are not
defined.
3.
Good : Needs are clearly stated and few stakeholders are defined.
4.
Very good : Needs are very clearly stated and most stakeholders are well
defined.
5.
Excellent : Needs are very clearly stated and all stakeholders are very well
defined.

1.2 Needs are appropriately prioritised.


1.
Poor : Needs are not prioritised / wrongly prioritised.
2.
Average : Needs are prioritised to some extent, but inputs used are not clear.
3.
Good : Needs are prioritised to a large extent and indicate usage of some
inputs.
  1. Very good : All needs are prioritised and indicate usage of most inputs.
  1. Excellent : All needs are appropriately prioritised and indicate usage of all inputs

(primary and secondary).

1.3 Context is clearly and fully mapped.


1.
Poor : Context is not mapped.
2.
Average : Context is somewhat clear, but only partially mapped. (e.g. learning
environment mapped but socio-cultural aspects and /or technical
facilities not considered).
3.
Good : Context is clear, though not fully mapped.(e.g. Learning
environment mapped and technical facilities determined, but socio-
cultural aspects not considered).
4.
Very good : Context is very clear and well mapped. (e.g. Socio-cultural aspects
well mapped along with the learning environment and technical
aspects).
5.
Excellent : Context is very clear, well mapped and is clearly reflected in the
profile document so as to guide the Design and Development
stages.

1.4 Learner profiles are adequately captured.


1.
Poor : Learner profile is not captured.
2.
Average : Learner profile is partially captured. (e.g. Academic level of the
learner determined, but learner attributes not considered).
3.
Good : Learner profile is captured to a large extent. (e.g. Academic level
and attributes considered, but learners with special needs not
considered).
4.
Very good : Learner profile is well-captured and the need for inclusiveness is
emphasised. (Learners with special needs also considered).
5.
Excellent : Learner profile is very well-captured and reflects how it will impact
the Design and Development stages.
1.5 Primary purpose of MLM is clearly stated.
1.
Poor : Purpose of MLM is not stated.
2.
Average : Purpose of MLM is stated, but not clear.
3.
Good : Purpose of MLM is clear, but task is not defined in detail.
  1. Very good : Purpose of MLM is clear and task is defined in detail.
  1. Excellent : Purpose of MLM is clearly stated with task well defined and includes

suggestions for treatment at Design and Development stage.


  1. Usage aspects of MLM are clearly specified. (e.g. standalone / series, supplementary, integrated and/or any other).


1.
Poor : Usage aspects of MLM are not indicated.
2.
Average : Usage aspects of MLM are indicated, but not clear.
3.
Good : Usage aspects of MLM are clearly stated, but do not include
additional suggestions/details.
4.
Very good : Usage aspects of MLM are clearly stated and include suggestions for
treatment.
5.
Excellent : Usage aspects of MLM are clearly stated, include suggestions for
treatment and reflect how they will impact the Design and
Development stages.

1.7 Content outline is indicative of the scope of the MLM.


1.
Poor : Content outline is not given.
2.
Average : Content outline is given, but only partially indicates the scope of the
MLM. (Few titles/sub-titles given).
3.
Good : Content outline is given and indicates the scope of the MLM to a
large extent. (Most titles / sub-titles are given and clearly placed).
4.
Very good : Content outline is well given and clearly indicates the scope of the
MLM. (All titles / sub-titles are clearly given and placed in logical /
natural sequence / hierarchy).
5.
Excellent : Content outline is well given, clearly indicates the scope of the MLM
and incorporates suggestions that impact the Design and
Development stages.

1.8 Raw content has been validated for appropriateness and accuracy.


1.
Poor : Raw content has not been validated for appropriateness and
accuracy. (e.g. features like logical sequencing, following content
outline, factual correctness, inclusiveness, etc., not considered).
2.
Average : Raw content has been only partially validated for appropriateness
and accuracy. (Only a few features considered and checked).
3.
Good : Raw content has been validated to a large extent for
appropriateness and accuracy. (e.g. Content outline is well followed
and checked for appropriateness and completeness).
4.
Very good : Raw content has been almost fully validated for appropriateness
and accuracy. (e.g. content outline, factual correctness and
completeness are considered and checked).
5.
Excellent : Raw content has been fully and thoroughly validated for
appropriateness and accuracy. (All features like content outline,
logical sequencing, completeness, factual correctness, sensitivity
and inclusiveness are considered and checked).

1.9 Content is accurately classified for design treatment as per learning domain.


1.
Poor : Content is not classified and learning domain is not identified.
2.
Average : Content is classified, but learning domain is not identified.
3.
Good : Content is classified and learning domain is identified, though not
appropriately.
4.
Very good : Content is classified accurately and learning domain identified
appropriately.
5.
Excellent : Content is accurately classified, learning domain is appropriately
identified and suggestions for Design and Development treatment
are given.

We invite your feedback, comments and suggestions by February 15, 2009. You may :

  • Input directly on the discussion page attached to this wikieducator page:
  • Send us an email to RSreedher@col.org or rvemraju@col.org or savisingh@and.du.ac.in
  • Send regular mail:

Commonwealth Educational Media Centre for Asia
8/4, Sarvapriya Vihar, New Delhi 110016


Please do include your name and affiliation if you would like to be acknowledged as a contributor in this process.

Road Works.svg Work in progress, expect frequent changes. Help and feedback is welcome. See discussion page. Road Works.svg