OERu/OERu 15.10 Meeting/Issues raised for 2015 CEOs meeting
From WikiEducator
< OERu | OERu 15.10 Meeting
Decision proposals arising from the 15.10 partner's meeting
- Achieve minimum viable product (MVP) for the OERu 1st year of study as delineated during the partners meeting
- Complete programme specification document for the OERu 1st year of study based on the action steps recommended by the partners meeting.
- 10 courses completed and delivered leading to an appropriate exit credential. Courses to be hosted on a common platform and available from OERu.org
- Adopt an expression of interest model where partners are invited to nominate and assemble courses to complete the MVP.
- Establish a programme director role and corresponding funding proposals to support the role.
- Identify stream co-ordinators to provide oversight in ensuring completion of MVP. Stream coordinators will liaise with the curriculum and programme of study working group.
- Approve the OERu Credit Transfer and Credit Accumulation guidelines with recommendation for the Standing Committee for Credit Transfer to initiate consultative development of supporting processes and implementation guidelines.
- Endorse process for approval of 2016 operational priorities and KPIs
- Note: OERu Strategic Plan 2015 -2017 was approved at November 2014 CEOs meeting
- Task the Strategic Planning working group to refine priorities and KPIs recommended during the 2015.10 partner's meeting.
- Distribute revised plan to OERu primary focal points and copy to CEOs for comment.
- Task the CEOs executive committee to approve the 2016 priorities and KPIs.
- Refinements to the institutional action plan (IAP) process
- Improve briefing process for the IAP call taking institutional readiness into account
- Design process so that the OERu IAP call is made from the executive
- Include option in the IAP for collaboration with network partners
- Open business model dissemination
- Prepare 1-page cover sheet and distribute OERF and OERu partner business models as a resource for partners to increase return on investment from the OERu partner network.
- Recommendations to minimise barriers of participation. The top three barriers to engagement identified by the Input evaluation survey in order of priority are:
- Competing demands on time and resources to maintain OERu project momentum.
- Lack of exemplars of OERu courses which demonstrate the end-to-end process from course nomination, through to design, delivery and awarding of credit.
- Varying levels of expertise and experience in OER, cooperative design models and designing materials for mobile devices.
Redacted version of issues arising from the partner's meeting
- Marketing, communications, and fund development
- Partner recruitment: Selected CEOs to help formulate strategy on how to sell the OERu case to CEOs including a clear summary of benefits to achieve 30 new partners by December 2017 (15 new partners by December 2016).
- Student recruitment: Establish team to develop marketing strategy for recruiting OERu learners
- Fund development: Corporate sponsorship and diversifying grant-based revenue
- Open technologies
- Invite all partner institutions to nominate an appropriate staff member with relevant IT /Educational Technology skills to join the OERu technology working group.
- Consideration of what OERu partners need to have in place in order to engage effectively in the OERu (institutional readiness)
- Establish mentoring model to support new and recent members.
- How should staff contributions be recognised?
- How are OERu partners recognised?
Record of initial issues raised during partners meeting
- CEOs to help formulate strategies on how to sell the OERu case to CEOs, including formulating a clear summary of benefits
- Moving from a nomination model of courses for a Bachelor in General Studies only, to include an expression of interest model based on a framework of targeted programs focussed on providing jobs for students agreed to by partners
- Advise on how to progress and implement the OERu IAP process (getting organisational sign off, responsible people)
- Recommendations for progressing marketing
- What do OERu institutions need to have in place to engage in the OERu implementation
- Inviting local technical staff at partner institutions to join the OERu technology working group.
- Marketing - refine focus
- Completed program of full courses leading to a credential
- How to sell the OERu case to CEOs – clear summary of benefits to meet recruitment objectives
- Based on the possible proactive dissemination of the aggregated open business model, delineate strategies/initiatives for creating awareness of the potential of OERu to generate more affordable access to higher education. The target audience for the proposed increasing awareness initiative should include politicians/government officials, who are responsible for policy-making associated with the funding of higher education, and who are (in many cases) increasingly concerned about the lack of fiscal sustainability of existing systems.
- Funding mechanisms to support a Programme Director
- Approval of credit transfer
- Mentoring programme - encourage early implementation for new and recent members (recognising staff contributions)
- MVP - reducing the barrier of time and resources
- Themes - programme directors