Human earth shapers/ETHS101/Rock Record/Philosophical Themes

Philosophical Themes

Overview

As mention in the Learning Pathway Earth systems: Overview. We will begin to introduce philosophical themes and how these can inform our understanding and interpretation of science.

These three lectures (around 10 minutes each) introduce some of the philosophical themes relevant to this unit, including the following:

1. Argument structure and the role of values in arguments
2. If it matters that humans are radically re-shaping the Earth, why does it matter?
3. Arguments that involve ought claims and how to understand those claims

Philosophical Themes

In this video, we explore the importance of a well-structured argument and its impact on our ability to understand and act on information. We also explore the impact of our values and how our values can augment our understanding or ability to act on information. This video is important in helping you to understand why when we are presented with one or two scientific facts, the human population can have so many responses to these facts. We consider the role of:

• Subjective preferences
• Objective truths
• Instrumental or Intrinsic values. (the impact of external or internal influences)

Philosophical Themes

Philosophical Themes

Human Earthshaping: Does it Matter?

Does it Matter? In this video, we explore why Human Earthshaping is OR isn't important. You will also engage with a thought experiment which is designed to uncover your internal values and perspectives, in relation to Humans as Earthshapers. This should provide you with an indication as to why given the same scientific fact, each of us can respond a different way.

Human Earthshaping: Does it Matter?

Human Earthshaping: Does it Matter?

Think and Share

Thought Experiment Using the Lecture material in 'Human EarthShaping: Does it Matter?' (the thought experiment starts at 6:02mins) We would encourage you to use WeNOTE to share your thoughts on the following thought experiment.

"Suppose that Fred is the last sentient creature on the planet and he knows that, for whatever reason, sentient life will never again appear on this planet. Just before exiting the scene, Fred destroys all of the planet's geology and biology. What he destroys is of great beauty and majesty, but he defends his actions by saying that it doesn't matter, since it will never again be appreciated or valued by anyone."

Do we accept Fred's justification, or do we think that what he did was wrong? Share your thoughts by posting a WeNote below, for example:

• I accept Fred's justification because ...
• I don't accept Fred's justification because ..

Note: Your comment will be displayed in the course feed.

• Remember a thought experiment is designed to uncover your intuitions and feelings so you can reflect upon yours and others responses. A part of your learning in this course, you are learning how thoughts, intuition, perspectives and feelings can integrate with scientific principles. This is an opportunity for you to practice.

The is/ought gap

In the videos below, we explore the differences between ought and is and how this gap can cause varying perspectives on scientific results. We wrestle with the question, 'given the science is there an answer'? You watch one OR both of the videos below.

The is/ought gap

The is/ought gap

The Is / Ought Gap - BBC radio

The Is / Ought Gap - BBC radio