BaCCC/Module 4/Lesson 1/Part 1
Contents
Module 4, Lesson 1: Ways of Mitigating Climate Change, Part 1
Introduction
After introducing you to the definition of mitigation, this lesson will briefly suggest how climate change can be mitigated. This is to ensure that everybody is aware of how they contribute to safeguarding – or threatening – the future. Some of these mitigation strategies can also negatively impact the world’s most vulnerable people.
Climate change mitigation involves identifying ways to reduce heat-trapping gas emissions, as well as finding ways to remove greenhouse gases from the atmosphere. Humans have many choices to reduce carbon dioxide and other emissions. We can mitigate climate change by reducing greenhouse gas emissions in a variety of ways. These include promoting greater energy efficiency and the use of renewable energy, as well as building more sustainable urban transport. As land, forests and oceans absorb and store carbon, we also need to adopt smarter ways to preserve and restore these “carbon sinks.”
Climate change is already affecting weather patterns, water resources, crop yields and marine ecosystems. Adaptation (see more in Module 6) helps people cope with increased risks to their lives and livelihoods from the changing climate. However, the poor and other marginalised people who are least able to cope are the hardest hit (see more in Module 5). Increasingly, policymakers are recognising the need to integrate climate-resilient strategies into long-term development programmes.
Terminology
The following terms are important in understanding the science behind climate change. If you want to remember them, write their meanings in your learning journal as you encounter them in the course content.
- adaptation
- carbon sinks
- climate-resilience
- marginalised
- mitigation
- vulnerable
(You can adjust the playback speed and/or turn on subtitles/captions.)
If you have trouble accessing the video, a summary is available below.
H5P Object Parameters
The H5P parameters below will be replaced by the actual H5P object when it's rendered on the WordPress site to which it's been snapshotted.
Resolving climate injustice
Back in 2012, the United States wasted more than half of the energy that flowed in its economy – enough to power the United Kingdom for seven years (CleanTechnica, 2013). You can see the graphic at: US Wastes 61-86% of Its Energy[3] Learn about negawatts (https://www.renewableenergyworld.com/energy-efficiency/whats-a-negawatt/), which are watts of energy that are saved (are not needed) because of energy conservation. |
Back in 1992, something momentous happened. At the Rio Earth Summit in Brazil, practically every country in the world agreed to the ultimate objective of the UNFCCC, which is “to prevent dangerous anthropogenic [human-caused] interference with the climate system.”
According to the IPCC, this meant that the world was going to work together (well, that was the intention at least) to avoid significant human interference with the Earth’s climate and “to stabilize greenhouse gas levels in a timeframe sufficient to allow ecosystems to adapt naturally to climate change, to ensure that food production is not threatened, and to enable economic development to proceed in a sustainable manner.”
Sadly, politics got in the way of our scientific understanding that we all had to reduce our greenhouse gas emissions, so the emissions kept going up instead of going down.
But it is important to realise that the responsibility for mitigation is not all on your shoulders, or your family’s, or your community’s or even your country’s. The mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions must take place at all levels and in all sectors of human endeavour. Governments at every level must do their part. Every small business, company, corporation or multinational must drastically reduce their contributions. Every sector. Practically every mode of transportation, including aviation and shipping, has to change. Every type of energy production: oil, gas, coal and even the manufacture of renewable energy infrastructure. Shops, factories, schools, recreation centres, farms . . . everyone in every community.
And now, here is the secret: We must ALL get to (virtually) zero carbon. We must create a world that runs on zero-carbon energy, zero-carbon manufacturing, zero-carbon transportation, etc. – or our world, according to an increasing number of climate scientists and the United Nations, will become unliveable. The 2021/22 IPCC report warned that “parts of the planet will become uninhabitable” and there is a “rapidly closing window” to safeguard the future. However, scientists also said that “there are multiple, feasible and effective options to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and adapt to human-caused climate change, and they are available now.” This report, according to the IPCC Chair, Hoesung Lee, underscored the urgency of taking more ambitious action. “If we act now,” he said, “we can still secure a liveable, sustainable future for all” (IPCC, 2021−2023).
The reason that politics got in the way of mitigation is that some politicians started thinking that every other country should cut their emissions first. But greenhouse gases have not been emitted equally. Read on to discover why some countries and corporations need to urgently embrace energy austerity (severe restrictions), while others – less responsible for today’s dangerous levels of greenhouse gas concentrations – deserve (and may need) more time to get to zero.
References
- ↑ UNICEF, 2023. Children at Risk of Cholera in Aftermath of Cyclone Freddy
- ↑ United Nations, 2023. Start with These Ten Actions!
- ↑ CleanTechnica, 2013. US Wastes 61-86% of Its Energy
- ↑ R enewable Energy World, n.d. What's a Megawatt?