Thread:Approving charters (5)

On my first attempt (here) at using this boiler plate (the version with 2 tables of signatures) for this section, I found it confusing:

As people started signing, it looked like duplication with possible ambiguity as the same names appeared in both tables including WCC members and non-WCC members in the first table.

I assume the intention is to have two levels of approval for Community project charters:


 * 1) by workgroup members (before submission to WCC)
 * 2) by the WCC.

I added some wording to clarify (here).

Suggestion to avoid such confusion: a separate page for Community Workgroup submissions:

=Community Workgroups=

== WG X ==

Status: submitted

== WG Y ==

Status: approved

etc.

Then we would only need one table in the charter and the process would become: To submit your Community workgroup charter add it to the Community Workgroups page ..., and then, whenever a Community project charter is approved by WCC, its main (charter) page receives.