Quality Assurance in Multimedia Learning Materials/Analysis

 I ANALYSIS

Indicators

1.1 Needs are clearly stated and comprehensive.

1.2 Needs are appropriately prioritised.


 * 1) Very good : All needs are prioritised and indicate usage of most inputs. 


 * 1) Excellent : All needs are appropriately prioritised and indicate usage of all inputs 

(primary and secondary).

1.3 Context is clearly and fully mapped.

1.4 Learner profiles are adequately captured.


 * 1) Very good : Purpose of MLM is clear and task is defined in detail. 


 * 1) Excellent : Purpose of MLM is clearly stated with task well defined and includes 

suggestions for treatment at Design and Development stage.


 * 1) Usage aspects of MLM are clearly specified. (e.g. standalone / series, supplementary, integrated and/or any other). 

1.7 Content outline is indicative of the scope of the MLM.

1.8 Raw content has been validated for appropriateness and accuracy.

1.9 Content is accurately classified for design treatment as per learning domain.

'''We invite your feedback, comments and suggestions by February 15, 2009. You may : ''' Commonwealth Educational Media Centre for Asia 8/4, Sarvapriya Vihar, New Delhi 110016
 * Input directly on the discussion page attached to this wikieducator page:
 * Send us an email to RSreedher@col.org or rvemraju@col.org or savisingh@and.du.ac.in
 * Send regular mail:

Please do include your name and affiliation if you would like to be acknowledged as a contributor in this process.