Examples of Multimedia Systems

{| style="border-bottom: #cc4e5c 3px solid; border-left: #cc4e5c 3px solid; width: 100%; background: #ffffcc; border-top: #cc4e5c 3px solid; border-right: #cc4e5c 3px solid" class="FCK__ShowTableBorders" cellspacing="6" cellpadding="5" {| style="margin: 3px; border-spacing: 4px" class="FCK__ShowTableBorders"
 * style="padding-bottom: 0px; margin: 0px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-top: 0px" valign="top" width="100%" |
 * style="padding-bottom: 0px; margin: 0px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-top: 0px" valign="top" width="100%" |
 * style="border-bottom: #ff9900 0px solid; border-left: #ff9900 0px solid; background-color: #fff; width: 5%; color: #000; vertical-align: top; border-top: #ff9900 0px solid; border-right: #ff9900 0px solid"|
 * style="border-bottom: #ff9900 0px solid; border-left: #ff9900 0px solid; background-color: #fff; width: 5%; color: #000; vertical-align: top; border-top: #ff9900 0px solid; border-right: #ff9900 0px solid"|



Case Studies depicted below have been adapted from various sources and Due credit is mentioned wherever the source is known.

=Case Study 1= 

Walt_Disney_12_Principles_of_Animation

= Case Study 2 =  CEMCA's Multimedia Learning Material Quality Assurance

http://wikieducator.org/Quality_Assurance_in_Multimedia_Learning_Materials/Analysis I ANALYSIS Indicators of Analysis
 * 1) Needs are clearly stated and comprehensive.
 * 2) Needs are appropriately prioritised.
 * 3) Context is clearly and fully mapped.
 * 4) Learner profiles are adequately captured.
 * 5) Primary purpose of MLM is clearly stated.
 * 6) Usage aspects of MLM are clearly specified. (e.g. standalone / series, supplementary, integrated and/or any other).
 * 7) Content outline is indicative of the scope of the MLM.
 * 8) Raw content has been validated for appropriateness and accuracy.
 * 9) Content is accurately classified for design treatment as per learning domain.

http://wikieducator.org/Quality_Assurance_in_Multimedia_Learning_Materials/Design II DESIGN Indicators of DESIGN
 * 1) Objectives are clearly defined, achievable, relevant and measurable.
 * 2) Content is pedagogically structured, logically sequenced and consonant with learner profile.
 * 3) Instructional Strategy is clearly stated, appropriate, achievable and compliant with ‘Analysis’ requirements.
 * 4) Media mix is appropriate, engaging and consonant with objectives.
 * 5) Learner Evaluation Scheme includes a variety of assessment techniques and is consonant with learning objectives.
 * 6) The Graphical User Interface (GUI) Design is intuitive, visually appealing and consistent.
 * 7) Fonts are legible and visually appealing.
 * 8) Layouts are clearly defined, consider all elements and reflect information hierarchy.
 * 9) Content, visuals, and instructional strategy are contextually relevant, gender and racially sensitive.
 * 10) Technical design is consonant with ‘Analysis’, ‘Instructional Strategy’ and ‘Visual Design’ requirements.
 * 11) The technical design reflects the latest developments in technology.
 * 12) Technical Design is compatible with on-line delivery requirements.
 * 13) Prototype Testing shows the effectiveness of ‘Instructional Design Strategy’, ‘Visual Design’ and ‘Technical Design’.

http://wikieducator.org/Quality_Assurance_in_Multimedia_Learning_Materials/Development III DEVELOPMENT Indicators of DEVELOPMENT
 * 1) Storyboard follows a Structure Map, Objectives and defined Instructional Strategies.
 * 2) Storyboard uses simple, correct and clear language.
 * 3) Instructions provided in the storyboard to the developers are unambiguous and detailed.
 * 4) MLM is validated by subject experts.
 * 5) MLM is compliant with specified standards.
 * 6) Process Documents facilitate easy and quick development of MLM
 * 7) MLM testing in a simulated environment satisfies overall performance requirements.

http://wikieducator.org/Quality_Assurance_in_Multimedia_Learning_Materials/Implementation IV IMPLEMENTATION Indicators for IMPLEMENTATION
 * 1) Implementation strategy provides clear roadmap for execution.
 * 2) Instructional manuals are self-explanatory, applicable and usable.
 * 3) Timelines for implementation are appropriate and realistic.
 * 4) Appropriate structure and resources are in place for implementation.
 * 5) Facilitators are empowered for implementation.
 * 6) Learners are adequately oriented.

http://wikieducator.org/Quality_Assurance_in_Multimedia_Learning_Materials/Evaluation V EVALUATION Indicators for Evaluation
 * 1) Evaluation strategy is clearly outlined.
 * 2) Evaluation process is rigorous and as per standard procedures.
 * 3) Institutional mechanisms required for evaluation are specified.
 * 4) Evaluation tools are objective, valid and reliable.
 * 5) Provision for feedback and improvement is made.

=Case Study 3= 

=Case Study 4= 

Welcome to the Course !