User:Geetugambhir68/Temp/Table 1.doc
Table 1: Variation of Emf with Concentration of Cd(II) ion.
S. No. | Concentrations of solution ( M) | - Potential ( mV ) |
1 | 1 x10-1 | |
2 | 5 x10-2 | |
3 | 1 x10-2 | |
4 | 5 x10-3 | |
5 | 1 x10-3 | |
6 | 5 x 10-4 | |
7 | 1 x10-4 | |
8 | 5 x 10-5 | |
9 | 1 x 10-5 | |
10 | 5 x 10-6 | |
11 | 1 x 10-6 | 84 |
Table 2: Effect of pH on Potential of Cd++ ion in Solution.
S. No. | pH of sample
|
-Potential (10-4 M) ( mV) | - Potential (10-5 M) (mV) |
1 | |
|
|
2 | |
|
|
3 | |
|
|
4 | |
|
|
5 | |
|
|
6 | |
|
|
7 | |
|
|
8 | |
|
|
9 | |
|
|
10 | |
|
|
Table3: Effect of Partially Non-aqueous Media on the Working of Cd(II) Selective Electrode.
S.No. | Non-aqueous content ( %v/v)
|
working Conc. Range (M) | slope (mV /decade) |
1 | 0 | 1x10-6 – 1x10-1 | 33 |
2 | Ethanol
25 50 |
1x10-6 – 1x10-1
1x10-6 – 1x10-1 1x10-6 – 1x10-1 |
32
31 29 |
3 | Acetonitrile
25 50
|
1x10-6 – 1x10-1
1x10-6 – 1x10-1 1x10-6 – 1x10-1 |
34
34 34 |
4 | Acetone
10 25 50
|
1x10-6 – 1x10-1
1x10-6 – 1x10-1 1x10-6 – 1x10-1 |
33
31 30 |
Table 4: Selectivity Coefficient Values for Cd(II) Selective Electrode as
Calculated by Fixed Interference Method.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Table 5: Values of Electrode Potential For 0.01 M Cd(II) solution in the
Presence of interfering metal ions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Table 6: Effect of Detergent on Working of Cd(II) Selective Electrode
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Table 7: Variation of Potential with Cd(II) ion for different Cd salts.
|
|
|
|
|
1 | |
|
|
|
2 | |
|
|
|
3 | |
|
|
|
4 | |
|
|
|
5 | |
|
|
|
6 | |
|
|
|
7 | |
|
|
|
8 | |
|
|
|
9 | |
|
|
|
10 | |
|
|
|
11 | 1x10-6 | |
|
|
12 | 5x10-7 | |
|
80 |
Table 8: Titration Data for 1x10-3 M Cd(II) Solution with EDTA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Table 9: Effect of concentration of interfering ions on potential of Cd (II)
Solution.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Table 10: Effect of Detergent and Surfactant on Potential of Cd(II) Solution.
|
|
Surfactant( 1%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1x10-6 | |
|
|
5x10-7 | |
|
36 |
Table 11: Functional Properties of Terpolymeric membrane
Membrane | Water content per g wet membrane ( g) | Porosity | Amount of KCl absorbed per g of membrane |
Methyl acrylate-Acrylonitrile
-Methyl methacrylate Terpolymer |
0.22 | 0.051 | 3.5x10-2 |
Table 12 Response time for Cd(II) Selective Electrode in Solvents of
Different Polarity.
|
|
25% acetone |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5x 10-4 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1x10-6 | |
|
|
5x10-7 | |
|
112 |
Legends
Figure 1: Variation of Emf With – log[Cd(II)] Ion.
Figure 2: Effect of pH of Solution on the Potential of Cd (II) Ion Selective Electrode.
Figure 3: Plots of EMF Versus -log[Cd(II)] Ions for Partially Non - Aqueous Media.
Figure 4: Variation of membrane potential of Cd(II) selective electrode in the presence of Ba2+ ion (FIM).
Figure 5: Effect of detergent and surfactant on the working of Cd(II) ion selective electrode.
Figure 6: Titration curve for potentiometric titration of 10-3 M Cadmium (II) solution with10-2 M with EDTA solution.