MBLEPMY FIRST ASSIGNMENT

Jump to: navigation, search

hey fellas. i noted the initial questions require a bit of literature review, and some of us are yet to receive the books so we were a bit handicapped, hence the seemingly unpreparedness. however as mentioned, we invite your much valued input even at this primary stage.

Kay go (talk)05:36, 14 March 2011

Point taken Kago, but the purposes of having a team is to provide leadership and guidance. If that means allocating task to team membetrs, then so it be. We might bas well need to have action points to get this working. Not a very good start, and i hope this will improve and soon.

JEREMIAH CHAPHXANYA (talk)05:40, 14 March 2011

I think if it is a team work we can get volunteers to some of the questions. We could have allocated individuals their parts that is very easy but we thought group insight first will help. Not sure whether iam making any sense.

Hove (talk)05:45, 14 March 2011
 

has anyone read the assignment?

Kay go (talk)05:46, 14 March 2011

yeah I have...the theoretical knowledge base required is high. Its a detailed case study with high analysis requirements. --Shumimlingo 16:49, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

Shumimlingo (talk)05:49, 14 March 2011

we do apologise a thousand times for the disappointing start. lets kindly make head way with the how we are going to tackle the assignment. You noted it requires a "great deal of theory" JC and "...high theoretical knowledge requirement" Shumi so are we suggesting that we should assign people chapters to read...

Kay go (talk)06:05, 14 March 2011
 

KG - Yes i have read it. There is a great deal of theory that we need to cover.

JEREMIAH CHAPHXANYA (talk)05:52, 14 March 2011
 
 

Hove and KG,

I believe the concern is that we don't have an action plan that we can critique as a group. I know earlier you cited that you would have this ready during the week. Kindly circulate this to us during the course of the week such that when we meet on Sunday we're discussing a document that we've had a chance to look at.

--Shumimlingo 16:46, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

Shumimlingo (talk)05:46, 14 March 2011

Shumi you are right. I think we could have even assigned duties to individuals and/or sub groups even without the prescribed textbooks and other resource. However, looking on our need to the right things first time we decided that we should have a common understanding. Right now we should having volunteers to all the questions instead of dictacting without looking on individual capabilities. It is our apology guys that we might have perceived this idea in different ways. Do we have any volunteers to any specific questions?

Hove (talk)05:53, 14 March 2011