Talk:Training Educators to Design and Develop ODL Materials/Types of Assessment in ODL/Archive
The work this group has produced is extraordinary. It is only fitting that such a well planned and laid out presentation be given the commendation that it deserves. We are especially pleased that this team used links to connect topics from the main page to the relevant explanations and elaborations on separate and equally well organized pages.
--Adesuwa 07:41, 16 March 2007 (CET)[Maria, Siatu, Roza, Charles]
Thanks guys, this is heartening to know since some of us are quite new to this. you have certainly made our day .--Johnclyde 07:54, 16 March 2007 (CET)
The formatting is excellent and easy to navigate.Also observed good use of templates. The horizontal navigation bar is very convenient.We noted that content in section 1.1 is well developed unlike other sections which we assume are still under development.We suggest that you review the activities with the view to minimise the number since this could be overwhelming for learners. Both sections 1.1 and 1.3 contain information on validity and reliability which seems to be a duplication (this is only listed a topic under 1.3 but there is no information as yet). We suggest you eliminate this information from one section. Under general aims it was a good idea to address all the key domains. However, we suggest that you label these as aims of the module instead of unit as this is not consistent with the rest of the module. We also commend you for well written objectives and use of different types of assessment. We suggest that you pay attention to some grammatical errors.
Overall, we are impressed with your archievement in a span of 24 hours.--Jdikinya 07:47, 16 March 2007 (CET)
We already made a lot of positive comments as a group (above), but I wish to reiterate that I'm really impressed with the slick design of your content. Keep up the good work. --Jerrybeukes 07:54, 16 March 2007 (CET)
Thank You; One question however: What impact do you think power point presentation would have in place of the text on the page as is!!!--Augustmoon 07:56, 16 March 2007 (CET)
The information on validity and reliability will not be elaborated on in 1.3. In addition we will address your concern re Aims...--Augustmoon 08:12, 16 March 2007 (CET)