Talk:Learning and Teaching in Practice/Educational design theory/Learning design roles

From WikiEducator
Jump to: navigation, search

Contents

Thread titleRepliesLast modified
Adjustments and sign off009:32, 7 July 2013
Suggestions002:18, 22 May 2013
Comments021:54, 16 May 2013

Adjustments and sign off

this page is signed off and ready to go. --Bronwynh 09:32, 7 July 2013 (UTC)

Just made a few tweaks.

  • Removed this sentence as OP had several projects with such a team, and may do again: In general, these sorts of teams are not found in NZ educational institutions as they rarely undertake such complex (and expensive!) projects.
Bronwynh (talk)09:32, 7 July 2013

Suggestions

Edited by another user.
Last edit: 02:18, 22 May 2013

addition here: Although one person may be charged with designing and developing a new curriculum, good practice relies on significant collaboration and consultation. The designer should be seen as part of a wider team. This means that all interested parties (the stakeholders) are more likely to be included in the process, potentially leading to a final product that is acceptable to them. So who are the likely stakeholders in your professional situation?

some further additions in italics - we have no such thing as a blended-learning specialist or educational designers with these specific roles any more, they are tasked predominantly with putting stuff online. :(

DONE - Pleft 02:18, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

Bronwyn Hegarty (talk)22:17, 16 May 2013

I like this. I don't think we have such a thing as an educational developer any more. Not sure what to do about that idea. :(

Bronwyn Hegarty (talk)21:54, 16 May 2013