Issues

Barcelona Charter for Innovation, Creativity and Access to Knowledge

Libre/sustainability interpretation

Charter  |  Issues  |  Etc.

Issue Tracker for the Barcelona Charter for Innovation Creativity and Access to Knowledge - Libre Interpretation.

For lengthy discussions use the "discussion" tab.

• See Colour Key - for issue and examples of headers (priority, effort required and status/progress).

Colours of issue headers indicate:

Title:	Title of Task Goes Here (with background as one of the colours below)							Progress
Priority	none	trivial	easy	routine	tricky	difficult	unknown	done
high	Background colour above behind the title indicates effort required							not started
medium	Background colour behind “Title:” (top left) indicates priority							on hold
low	Background colour of the right column indicates progress							ahead
								on track
								behind
								in trouble

Top left cell (priority): high (orangered), medium (orange), low (yellow)
Title cell (effort): none/done (lightgreen/green), trivial (silver), easy/routine (yellow/yellow), tricky (orange), unknown (lightgreen) or known to be difficult (orangered).
Right column (status/progress): done (green), not started (white), on hold (silver), ahead (lightgreen), on track (yellow), behind (orange), in trouble (red).

Education and Access to Knowledge

...

Freedom and Public Knowledge

This content resource is a stub. Please help by adding more information.

Title:	Expand on Patents
Submitted by:	Kim Tucker 14:10, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
Status:	To Do
Comments:	There is an external reference to a2k draft: expand on this and generally dig deeper into the patents issue. It might make sense to have patents in some industries. What industries and under what conditions?
(medium priority, tricky, not started)

Legal Reform

Title:	Reverse three-step test
Submitted by:	Kim Tucker 19:09, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
Status:	Discuss?
Comments:	Inserted the word "general" into: "2. when methods are used that do not undermine or discriminate against the general use, modification and sharing of knowledge, creative works and technology infrastructures, services and software;" assuming that the method used would probably restrict access and use of this specific resource if all three steps/conditions applied.
(medium priority, easy, not started)

Title:	Second bullet under Fair Use (4.4)
Submitted by:	Kim Tucker 14:55, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
Status:	Discuss?
Comments:	What exactly does this mean? "The defence of the right to private copying and fair use of works should be firm and absolute, given that copying is the very basis for learning and culture. Authors/creators are indebted to shared culture and for this reason their contributions to culture should not be subject to any form of compensation beyond commercial use of their work (sales, fees and royalties related to said sales or performances)".
(low priority, medium, not started)

Title:	Fifth bullet under Fair Use (4.4)
Submitted by:	Kim Tucker 15:05, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
Status:	Discuss?
Comments:	::"5.In addition, we subscribe to the delineated list of fair uses compiled in “Article 3-1 - General Limitations and Exceptions to Copyrights” of draft document Access to Knowledge 2005." Consider listing them or summarising.
(low priority, routine, not started)

Glossary and References

Title:	Check Glossary for completeness
Submitted by:	Kim Tucker 14:20, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
Status:	To Do
Comments:	Check: cultural development - sociocultural evolution , divides (digital/ knowledge/ language/ culture/ geographical/ ...) equity, equality – democracy – also liberal democracy and cosmopolitan democracy. sui generis database - explanation sufficient?
(medium priority, easy, not started)

Title:	Mouseover definitions
Submitted by:	Kim Tucker 14:20, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
Status:	Parked ("nice to have")
Comments:	To save the reader from having to scroll through a long glossary.
(low priority, routine, on hold)

Title:	Check references
Submitted by:	Kim Tucker 14:39, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
Status:	To Do
Comments:	Check and update references
(medium priority, routine, not started)

Title:	Check that footnotes in odf version are included
Submitted by:	Kim Tucker 14:50, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
Status:	Done
Comments:	Easy on WE as the <ref> tag is supported.
(high priority, easy, done)

Licenses

Title:	Licenses
Submitted by:	Kim Tucker 14:39, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
Status:	To Do
Comments:	Check the license are done right. WikiEducator automatically covers CC-BY-SA. Do we need to include the text of the GNU Free Documentation License? A nice touch: add the emblems of these licenses.
(medium priority, routine, not started)

Etc.

• Synchronise with notes towards 1.1
• Definition of Open Access is wrong - see http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/overview.htm
• Check the mailing list - many issues raised re 1.0, some addressed here already.