Professional Assessment Conversations
A professional assessment conversation is often used as an assessment tool for recognising prior learning. The conversation is between the assessor/s and the candidate to draw out or clarify information on the candidates individual experiences and relevant skills in relation to the learning outcomes or graduate profile for which the candidate is demonstrating their prior learning. The conversation allows for additional information to be provided that may not have been included as part of the evidence presented. The assessor/s use their professional knowledge and expertise to encourage the candidate to expand upon the evidence and information provided through the types of questions asked.
Questions that are used in a professional assessment conversation are not intended as a form of test or exam but as encouragers for the candidate to express more about their prior learning and how it was acquired.
As with any assessment method there are key principles that need to be adhered to.
What are the four key principles?
- Validity - assessing what is intended to be assessed
- Fairness - not advantaging or disadvantaging any candidate
- Reliability - consistency of assessment judgements
- Flexibility - in considering all valid evidence relevant to the learning outcomes or graduate profile
|Assessments may begin with a presentation by the candidate and then a professional assessment conversation may occur following the presentation.This is an approach often used for full qualification RPL assessments.
Another approach could be using the professional assessment conversation as the main way in which prior learning is explored and this would be supported by evidence. This approach works well for the RPL of a course where the candidate prefers to talk to, outline or explain aspects of their prior learning and experience.
Do a little exploring. Can you think of other ways in which a professional assessment conversation can be used?
| Consider the following questions:
- What factors impact upon the choice of assessment method for prior learning?
- Identify several different scenarios in which a candidate may be seeking assessment of prior learning (refer to the examples given in the "Question" section above). What would you consider to be the best assessment approach for each of your scenarios identified?
Add your thoughts to your learning journal.
Remember to submit an excerpt from your exploration around this module and the previous module. Send this directly to Heather.
Critically consider the process of assessing for prior learning from the perspective of a lecturer in an assessor or facilitator role, exploring the following areas:
- You are asked to:
- Explore the processes, practices and possible tools for assessment (how the evidence is assessed) - (due end of 6th module)
- Marking criteria:
- Critical discussion of assessment tools and processes in recognising prior learning (how the evidence is assessed)
- discussion is referenced and supported by literature sources
NB: Critical discussion involves a depth of thought that considers and debates a variety of perspectives including your own. Critical in this sense refers to reviewing, analysing and evaluating in depth; it does not mean focusing on negativity. It is possible to critically discuss and still totally agree with a particular perspective.
Formal Learners: If you have questions or want to start a discussion around this module go to the Moodle Discussion Board and start a new thread.